|
The Lords' Witnesses The Lord said: " Keep on asking, and it will be given you; keep on seeking, and you will find; keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you." (Matthew 7:7)
euei
|
|
|
|
Covenants – The Master Plan The
1st, 2nd and 3rd Ransom Covenants, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Righteousness Covenants,
and the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Abrahamic Covenants, the 1AC, 2AC, 3AC To download the covenant chart for printing click here:
Definition:
A covenant is an agreement between two parties. Definition:
A Mediator of a covenant with God is man/angel with whom God (directly or
indirectly) has made a covenant, who subcovenants with a third party group of
men/angels in order that they too may enter into a covenant with God through
him. Bible
reading: Genesis 12 -15,17,22, Galatians 3, Romans 4 The
ARC the HARC and the PARC, the 3 Master Covenants Adam's sons are born condemned to death under the death penalty
passed and eventually executed on Adam. Adam can only pass on to his sons the
life that he has, he cannot pass on everlasting life to them, because he himself
only had a finite life. In fact really it is Eve who cannot pass on everlasting
life to her sons and daughters because women give life physically, and she only
had a finite life due to the death sentence on her. This reasoning is an example
of what we call the 'Dirty Water Principle', which is not a principle of the
bible code, but is a principle of common sense. One cannot clean anything with
dirty water. Likewise a priest cannot pass on to his congregation a cleanliness
that he does not himself possess. Now women are the physical priests, they give
birth physically; God has chosen them to give physical life on his behalf. But
men give birth spiritually; God has chosen them to give life after death on his
behalf, or to give life through Armageddon. Make no mistake it is as unnatural
for a woman to baptize as it is for a man to give birth. Men and women have
equal value, and men and women have equal rights, but we do not have identical
roles to play and we do not have equal authority. The man has authority over the
woman. Men love making decisions and especially love bossing women about. Men
make decisions easily, women find it harder, and love being indecisive. But men
make better decisions if they listen to women who love to correct them. Women
have better all round vision (rods) and men have better focus (cones). We are
designed to act as a pair in making decisions. If we do act as a pair with
the woman recognizing the man's better focus and the man recognizing the woman's
better all round vision, then we make the best decisions we can. If we act in
competition to each other recognizing nothing for ourselves but soaking up soap
opera relationship values of pride and status wherein both parties wish to be
the boss and two people are wrenching at the same steering wheel then we make
the worst decisions we can. Just because men make the decisions does not mean they should
exclude women, on the contrary they should consult women just as the chairman of
the board consults the other board members. For women are the diplomats of this
world. They advise the men and can change a man's decision without having the
authority to change his decision. And a woman will see the fault in any man's
decision every time if she cares about him, because her peripheral vision is
better than his. So if he listens to her, then his decisions will be the better
for it. We two are perfect compliments for each other if we co-operate in wisdom
and in love. But we destroy each other if we compete in political correctness
and in blind power games. Eve of course failed to consult her husband and
therefore got lead down the garden path (out of the garden). And Adam of course
chose Eve over God. Women have not changed today and neither have men as regards
their basic characters, but our experience if turned into wisdom through
accurate knowledge of God can overcome our flawed and animalistic basic
instincts. Indeed overcoming these is our work in progress as junior
members of God's family. The
overwhelming majority of men today put women or a woman or being attractive to
women before God as Adam did. The overwhelming majority of women today choose
status over both their husband and God as did Eve. Now
both Adam and Eve had life subject to a death penalty when they had Cain. So by
the dirty water principle, Eve, the physical priestess of life, was not able to
pass on to her children life without a death penalty. 5
Look! With error I was brought forth with birth pains, and in sin my mother
conceived me (Psalms 51). So all of her sons and daughters likewise have life subject to the
same death penalty. In fact we all exist today only due to the stay of execution
granted to Adam and Eve by God, and we all die today, due to that one same
penalty. This death penalty is enforced and exists only in our bodies, which age
and die as a result. God will not make a legal agreement directly with humans in this
condition. For we are condemned to death and are only alive by means of a stay
of execution on our sentence, so God has nothing with a future to make any
agreement with. Instead he makes the effort to solve this problem whilst still
obeying his own principles, by choosing one man for each covenant or subcovenant,
whom he knows will turn out good, and be saved, and by lifting the death penalty
on him (if necessary). Of course he cannot just lift his own death penalty. He
does it on the basis that either Jesus' (Michael's) or Gabriel's or
Melchizedek's ransom sacrifice is going to occur or has already occurred,
depending on when this man lived (we will explain these three ransoms shortly).
This person then becomes a mediator of the legal agreement, or covenant, which
God wishes to make with mankind. The mediation works by God making a covenant
with this person, and this person then making the same covenant with the rest of
us. So that the mediator is a subcovenanter with God. Although very few men or
angels covenant directly with God, because St. Paul has told us literally: 5 One for God, one and
mediator of God and of men, man, Christ, Jesus (1 Timothy 2 - Literal
translation). The
above is a deliberately ambiguously written scripture. In the literal meaning,
which applies at the time Paul wrote this scripture. The correct translation is: 5 For one God [there is],
one [who is] also a mediator of God and of men, [a] man, Christ, Jesus (1
Timothy 2 - Literal translation) This
translation is forced by the order of the words 'one and'. Nearly all bibles
incorrectly translate the above as: 5 For there is one God and
one mediator between God and men, a man, Christ Jesus (1 Timothy 2 - NWT). The
mistranslation arises from the words of Paul's statement that... 20 Now there is no
mediator where only one person is concerned, but God is only one (Galatians 3). So
God cannot mediate a covenant between himself and someone (which is obvious from
the definition of a mediator as being a sub covenanter). Although the mistranslation is also contrary to the wording in
Greek. For it would only be the correct translation if the Greek read 'and one'
rather than 'one and'. Jesus is a God, and was of course a man, but he is not
the only God, if one takes God to mean 'of divine constitution' (i.e. an angel).
He is not the only angel who has mediated between Jehovah and man as we shall
see. But he is presently the only angel permitted to perform such mediation,
because since his death, he has been the firstborn angel of Jehovah, and so has
the firstborn rights, which we call the Firstborn Master Covenant. He has also
been since his death the only God requiring worship, who is also a mediator
between God and man. Jesus was elevated in status from an angel, to a God
requiring worship, after he died and was given the name above every other name
named, which name is Jehovah. 9 For this very reason
also God exalted him to a superior position and kindly gave him the name that is
above every [other] name (Philippians 2). 20 with which he has
operated in the case of the Christ when he raised him up from the dead and
seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places, 5 For example, to which
one of the angels did he ever say: You are my son; I, today, I have become your
father? And again: I myself shall become his father, and he himself will become
my son? So
at the time Paul wrote to Timothy, Jesus was a Mighty God, a God requiring
worship like Jehovah, but he was not Almighty God, who is Jehovah himself...
6 For there has been a
child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will
come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor,
Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9). Now Jesus earned this increased status together with the rights of
the firstborn angelic son of God, when he gave his life for us and to prove God
correct. Satan lost these rights when he killed Adam and Eve. The right of the
firstborn angelic son of God is that God will do everything through him. In fact
Satan was the first angel born to God, the first angel to be created by God. So
if Satan had not lost his firstborn rights at Adam's sin, then God would not
have been able to covenant directly with anyone other than Satan. But since
Michael did not earn these rights for himself until he died on the stake/cross,
there was a period between Adam's sin and Jesus' ransom during which God was
free to covenant with any of his angels. But after Jesus died, since he then had
the firstborn rights, all covenants had to be master mediated by him. This is
the logic behind Paul's words to Timothy, penned after Jesus died. 5 For one God, one also a
mediator of God and of men, man, Christ, Jesus. The
full literal meaning is therefore: For
there is one God requiring worship, one who is also a mediator (of a ransom
covenant) between Jehovah and men, someone who was a man but now is an angel,
and who became a God to be worshipped after he died, Jesus Christ. The 3
Master Covenants between God and Man without using the Successive Designations
Principle of the Code
We all know about the New Covenant (1NC), that Jesus made at the
last supper, and we all know about the First Abrahamic Covenant (1AC) of Genesis
12. But the angelic salvation offered by the 1NC did not just appear with Jesus.
Neither did the blessing of Abraham, the benefit to the sons of the 1AC, which
is the resurrection into the kingdom of God on earth, just appear with Abraham.
Both of these covenants have superior covenants, which we call Master covenants.
There are in fact 3 Master covenants for the salvation of our species. We
discovered them by applying the bible code to the scripture that the NWT
mistranslates as: 5 For there is one
God, and one mediator between God and men, [a] man, Christ, Jesus (1 Timothy 2) This scripture has 3 successive designations for the mediator
between God and men. He is called ‘[a] man’, ‘[a] Christ’, and
‘Jesus’. Using the Successive
Designations Principle of the code, this means that in the word
symbolic meaning, there are 3 mediators between God and men. However we have not
yet covered all of the code, so we will instead deduce their existence from the
literal meaning of other scriptures. We know from 1 Timothy 2:5 quoted above that Michael ransomed Adam
in some way, so let us examine the ransoming blood of Jesus’ Master covenant,
the ARC. It is not possible for Jesus to Ransom Adam and then for his blood only
to apply to people who lived after Abraham. His blood must actually apply to the
forefathers of Abraham as well, so there must be a covenant above any Abrahamic
Covenant, which passes on the ransoming value of Jesus’ blood. Taking the
argument to its limit, there must be a Master Ransom Covenant, which Abraham and
the mediators of the Pre flood and peri-flood systems sit below. We call the
Master Covenant between Jesus and God, the Angelic Ransom Covenant; we call the
immediately inferior Universal Righteousness Covenant between Jesus and Adam,
the 3rd Righteousness Covenant, the 3RC, because Jesus died to give us
everlasting angelic life which is the righteous decree in the spirit from God.
22 However, now, because
you were set free from sin but became slaves to God, you are having your fruit
in the way of holiness, and the end everlasting life. 14 how much more will the
blood of the Christ, who through an everlasting spirit offered himself without
blemish to God, cleanse our consciences from dead works that we may render
sacred service to [the] living God? (Hebrews 9). 11 And yet that is what
some of you were. But you have been washed clean, but you have been sanctified,
but you have been declared righteous in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ and
with the spirit of our God (1 Corinthians 6). The righteous decree in the spirit is the end of the spirit
baptism. This is the point where one gets everlasting life - U13.
So the blood of Michael gives everlasting life, which is a completed spirit
baptism, which is entry into the ARC, which entry is for ever and cannot be
revoked. This is how Jesus becomes our eternal father. 6 For there has been a
child born to us, there has been a son given to us, and the princely rule will
come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor,
Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9). 5 For one God, one also a
mediator of God and of men [i.e. between God and men], man, Christ,
Jesus. Jesus corresponded to Adam and ransomed him. This ransom is said
to be 'over all ones'. This does not mean that Jesus' ransom of Adam covers all
of Adam's genetic sons. 28 Just as the Son of man
came, not to be ministered to, but to minister and to give his soul a ransom in
exchange for many [not all, but many] (Matthew 20). As we shall soon see in the case of the first
Abrahamic covenant,
covenants do not cover the mediator's genetic descendents, they cover those who
enter the covenant being mediated. The 1AC does not cover to those with the
genes of Abraham, but rather it covers those with the faith of Abraham, for it
was a covenant given as a result of the faith of Abraham which therefore had
faith as an entrance criterion. By entering the 1AC one became a son of
Abraham's faith rather than a son of his loins. The corresponding ransom for Adam by the Master
Mediator/Covenanter/Ransomer Jesus is over, it covers, all those who enter into
the 3RC which Adam, his ransomee mediates. These people may be genetic sons of
Adam or may be pre-adamic or non adamic! They may have lived in the pre-flood,
the peri-flood or the post-flood systems. They are the men of 1 Timothy 2:5. 15 But it is not with the
gift as it was with the trespass. For if by one man's trespass many died, the
undeserved kindness of God and his free gift with the undeserved kindness by the
one man Jesus Christ abounded much more to many. 10 For [the death] that he
died, he died with reference to sin once for all time. But [the life] that he
lives, he lives with reference to God (Romans 6). So Jesus is the Master Mediator of the ARC with God and his
ransomee Adam is the Universal Mediator of the 3RC with us. But
Paul relates Jesus, the high priest of the ARC, to Melchizedek as follows. 20 This hope we have as
anchor for the soul, both sure and firm, and it enters within the curtain, where
a forerunner has entered on our behalf, Jesus, who has become a high priest
according to the manner of Melchizedek (Hebrews 6). But
how did Jesus enter within the curtain? 11 However, when the
Christ came as high priest of the good things that have come to pass, through
the greater and more perfect tent, not made with hands, that is not of this
creation, Now if Jesus is a high priest according to the manner of
Melchizedek, then Melchizedek is a high priest according to the manner of Jesus.
So Melchizedek also entered into some kind of holy place with his own blood and
performed a ransom, which was the covenant basis of his priesthood. In other
words he was also a master covenanter between God and men. But Melchizedek
started life as a non adamic man, as Jared in fact, the Father of Enoch - U506.
Now there were two cherubs on the Ark of the Covenant in the most holy place,
not one. And Solomon himself built two huge Cherubs for the holy place where the
ark was to be kept. 23 Further, he made in the
innermost room two cherubs of oil-tree wood, ten cubits being the height of each
one (1 Kings 6). But the ark itself is symbolizing the angelic body of Jesus -
because this body is the validation sacrifice of the Angelic Ransom Covenant
which we all are eventually saved by - U509.
So neither of the two Cherubs on the ark or in the most holy place are Michael
who is Jesus - U14b
So who are they? Well, we know that Gabriel is one, since the two Cherubs
guarding the way to the tree of life must have been Michael and Gabriel. And we
know that there are three Cherubs in all from Ezekiel 10 where a Cherub who is
also a man clothed with linen thrusts his hand in between the two Cherubs of the
Chariot of Jehovah which has 4 wheels (One needs to read Ezekiel 10 carefully to
see that there are 2 Cherubs and 4 Wheels in the chariot). So who is the third
Cherub? Well since Cherubs are involved in God's interactions with man, and
since Melchizedek is a high priest according to the manner of Jesus, he is the
third Cherub. Having started life as a human, he is the 'most human' of the
three. Satan himself used to be a Cherub... 14 You are the anointed
cherub that is covering, and I have set you. On the holy mountain of God you
proved to be. In the midst of fiery stones you walked about. Satan was the firstborn angel of God - U243.
God created him first. God gave him the Firstborn Master Covenant, he agreed to
act only through Satan, his firstborn, this is why he was the angelic overseer
of the Garden of Eden. He lost his firstborn right when he sinned, lying to Eve
and deceiving her into killing Adam (who was not deceived, but who loved his
wife more than he loved God's laws). At this point Satan ceased being a Cherub.
So a Cherub is an angel who covenants directly with God. So Gabriel and
Melchizedek must also covenant directly with God as Michael does with the ARC. But how does Gabriel's priesthood work? Well, when Gabriel
appeared to Zechariah, he was standing at the right side of the incense altar,
and he said: 19 I am Gabriel, who
stands near before God (Luke 1). Now God, although he is almighty, never breaks his own laws, for
he is not a hypocrite like powerful men down here. Likewise, Gabriel, the angel
of the Lord, will not break God’s laws. So he had a right to be standing in
the holy place. In fact ‘standing near before God’ is a euphemism for being
a priest of God. Yet even Gabriel himself was not in the most holy place with
the Ark. He was in the holy place with the incense altar. So Gabriel has also entered into the first compartment of the holy
place as a priest and he is sitting upon the Ark of the Covenant next to
Melchizedek in the second compartment in statue. So plainly he is also a priest
to God similar to Jesus. He cannot of course be a priest after the manner of
Aaron, since he does not trace his genealogy to Levi. But being a cherub, and
having entered himself physically into the holy place (but not the most holy
place), the blood of his priesthood must also enter into the first tent but not
into the second. Now only the blood of Michael enters into the second compartment,
the most holy place, to give an everlasting deliverance, since it is he who
baptizes in Holy Spirit and fire, not Gabriel or Melchizedek. So the blood of
Gabriel enters into the first compartment, where he stood with Zechariah. And
the blood of Melchizedek enters into another holy place of some sort. It appears
that Melchizedek is outside in the courtyard in this symbolism. Now Gabriel was in John who started a water baptism - U506,
and Michael was in Jesus who started a spirit baptism (by baptizing only Peter,
who he renamed). And in fact every
time the three of them, Melchizedek, Gabriel and Michael appear, they perform
the following baptism routine. Melchizedek presides over the entrance of Gabriel, and then
Gabriel presides over the entrance of Michael. Every time, that is, except the
first time, when Melchizedek presided over the entrance of Michael and then
later presided over the entrance of Gabriel - U506.
And yet here is Gabriel standing by the incense altar right where Michael enters
into the Most Holy. If you put this whole Jigsaw together you have Gabriel as the
master covenanter of a water baptism (the holy place), and Michael as the Master
Covenanter of a spirit baptism (the most holy place). You also have Melchizedek
having a covenant that must exist outside of baptism (since there are no other
baptisms performed by men). This is the covenant of God’s love, the covenant
of faith. For the order of progression of every Jew and every Christian, is
Faith, Water, Spirit, or Faith, Spirit, Water. In other words it is Melchizedek,
Gabriel, Michael, or it is Melchizedek, Michael Gabriel, the very two orders
that these three Cherubs appear in when they possess humans - U506. Now Adam lost two souls when he sinned, he lost his associated
angelic soul (for he was born as both an angel and a human, he was born again
when he was born if you like, since he was a son of God without sin and such
sons are angels) and he lost his edenic human soul. His indefinitely lasting
edenic human soul was converted into a 960 year long ageing human soul by God,
as his last act of creation at the very end of the 6th creative 'day' of Genesis
1. Well, Michael ransomed the one soul, the angelic soul, for Adam
and his sons, and Gabriel ransomed the other soul, the human soul, for Adam and
his sons. Melchizedek actually ransomed Adam's dad, who was obviously pre-adamic.
Pre-adamics as a race were fatherless, motherless and without genealogy, like
Melchizedek (who was the second incarnation of Jared and who appeared in the
peri-flood system) and those of Adam's sons with faith but without water or
spirit baptism, who again have no visible spiritual genealogy (no visible
baptism path). For Paul says of Melchizedek... 3 In being fatherless,
motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of
life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually
(Hebrews 7). The ransom covenant for Michael, by which he becomes our angelic
father, is the ARC and the universal righteousness covenant for his ransomee
(the associated angel of Adam) we call the 3RC (3rd Righteousness Covenant). The ransom covenant for Gabriel, by which he becomes our edenic
father we call the HARC (Human Adamic Ransom Covenant), and the universal
righteousness covenant for his ransomee (the human soul of Adam) we call the
2RC. The ransom covenant for Melchizedek, by which he becomes the
edenic father of the pre adamics, and the non baptized sons of Adam, we call the
Pre-adamic Ransom covenant (the PARC), and the universal righteousness covenant
for his ransomee, we call the 1RC (1st Righteousness Covenant). Melchizedek actually ransomed Adam's human 'father' U13,
(in the same sense that Joseph was Jesus' father). He became the father in faith
of the pre-adamics. We call this man Abadam (This is Hebrew for the father of
Adam). So now we can finally understand the deep things of Hebrews 9 that
Paul was not speaking in detail about! 2 For there was
constructed a first tent in which were the lampstand and also the table and the
display of the For the first compartment is the HARC, for the sons of water, and
the second compartment is the ARC, and the temple courtyard is the PARC for the
pre adamics, and the unbaptized sons of Adam with true faith in Jehovah (before
33Nisan16) or in Jesus and Jehovah (after 33Nisan16) or with a good conscience
or with a good community conscience (sighing and groaning over the detestable
things happening and translating this pain into selfless acts). For more details
of the temple symbolism see - U509. If you like, Melchizedek is the father of the orphans. He fathers
those who God himself adopts, due to their faith in him or in Jesus, or due to
their good conscience which is their faith in goodness, even though they never
join a true religion. 15 They are the very ones
who demonstrate the matter of the law to be written in their hearts, while their
conscience is bearing witness with them and, between their own thoughts; they
are being accused or even excused (Romans 2). 4 And Jehovah went on to
say to him: Pass through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem,
and you must put a mark on the foreheads of the men that are sighing and
groaning over all the detestable things that are being done in the midst of it
(Ezekiel 9). So in summary... Let
us be absolutely clear about the PARC. Christians who believe in the Trinity and
Jews who do not believe in Jesus, and Kabala mystics who do not believe in
Jesus, and Muslims who believe in the Koran and Hindus who believe in Brahman
who is ‘more than the universe’ but not a person, and Buddhists who believe
in enlightenment apart from a God etc., and the followers of the Dali Lama who
believe in re-incarnation and Sheikhs who believe in one true God but not in his
son, all have a worthless and misplaced faith from a salvation point of view.
They have fallen for the snares of Satan, who delights in providing unseaworthy
lifeboats full of gaping holes, and watching sincere people jumping into them
and drowning. Many of them of course are genuine in their love for God, and
would have had a true faith were they not being deceived as Eve was. However,
these ones are saved, and become sons of the PARC, not because of their
misplaced faith, but because of their good conscience or because of their
selfless acts. So
the sons of the PARC are in fact sons of true faith in God or sons of true faith
in goodness. Incidentally we shall see later due to the wording of the first
Abrahamic covenant, that anyone who changes religion because they are sincerely
searching for God, is a son of the 1AC even if they change from one false
religion to the next, or even if they change from a true religion to a false
religion! The effort to leave the religion of your father, your family, you
community or your country and to go to the land, the religious administration,
that you believe God to be showing you makes you a son of Abraham by faith even
if God was actually trying to show you another land entirely! The
PARC, the HARC and the ARC, the 3 Master Covenants between God and Man, and the
1RC, the 2RC and the 3RC, the 3 Universal Righteousness Covenants from the
Successive Designations Principle of the Code 5 For one God, one also a
mediator of God and of men, man, Christ, Jesus. The phrase: A man, Christ, Jesus is a triple successive
designation, since the word 'Christ' is used here as a noun - see the Successive
Designation Principle of the code. The word 'God' is repeated twice
and so must take a different symbolic meaning in one of the three word symbolic
threads to its literal meaning - see the Repetition
Principle of the code. The 3 word symbolic meanings of Paul's words
are: Melchizedek's
Ransom
For there is one angel, one who is also a mediator between Jehovah
and men, a man (Melchizedek). Who gave himself a corresponding human soul ransom
for Adam's father, covering all pre-adamic and adamic sons of true faith and all
pre-adamic and adamic men of good conscience, without water or spirit baptisms. By believing 'pre-adamic' humans we mean humans who lived after
Adam, and heard about Jehovah through Adam's sons, and believed in true faith,
but were not themselves sons of Adam. For Adam was the first human priest. It
was through him that mankind, pre-adamic mankind, learned about God. This Master
Covenant for the ransomer we call the PARC and this universal righteousness
covenant for the ransomee we call the 1RC. Melchizedek was Jared, the father of
Enoch - U506.
We do not know precisely how pre-adamic man got started. Anthropology tells us
it was around 2.8 million years ago.
But we do believe that they had a life span similar to our 120 year maximum
lifespan today - see [235].
Presumably God picked Adam's father on his good conscience. This man would be a
kind of Abraham to the pre-adamics. Then Melchizedek would have ransomed him.
And then all men of faith, regardless of their genealogy could come into the
1RC. What we are saying is that Adam's dad was the real, the archetypical,
Abraham. He fathered everyone with a future, both quasi genetically in the case
of Adam and his sons and through a covenant of faith in the case of them and the
pre-adamics. Melchizedek would not have ransomed Neanderthals, Homo Habilis or
any other early type of human that had become extinct by the time of Adam,
because they were not subject to any spiritual test (another way of looking at
this is they had no knowledge of bad from Satan). Adam did not appear until Homo
Sapiens (Cro-Magnon man) was able to think spiritually, by which we mean that he
was able to discern with his mind the existence of things that he could not
detect with his senses, or as an alternative definition, he was able to perform
a two step thought process, he was able to walk mentally, to think logically. 3 In being fatherless,
motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of
life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually
(Hebrews 7). This description of Melchizedek's lineage, applies to a large
extent to pre-adamic man as well. 7 pairs of pre-adamics (clean, i.e. baptized,
non sons of Adam) came through the ark with the 8 adamic souls. These interbred
with Adam's kids bringing down the lifespan of man from 960 years to 120 years.
Statistically it is inordinately unlikely that any were left by the time of
Jesus who had not interbred to such an extent that they were effectively adamic.
But actually it does not matter whether they were or they weren't for just as in
the case of Abraham, one does not have to be a son genetically to be a son by
covenant. So the pre-adamics could benefit from both Gabriel’s adamic ransom
and Michael's adamic ransom. Melchizedek (his name in the peri-flood system) started life as
Jared in the pre flood system - U506.
Jared fathered Enoch who fathered Methuselah. Jared it was that ransomed the pre
adamic humans. These humans were obviously under a death sentence (since they
died like we do). But their sentence was not due to a sin, we assert, it was due
to their being created as a-spiritual beings. Only when they had developed
spirituality, did God introduce himself to them through Adam, and begin the
process of saving them from death. Since the pre adamics were not born with
judicial life, they needed to be ransomed in order to gain it. It is perfectly possible that there were pre-adamic men and women
around at the time of King David or even at the time of the exile to Babylon,
but not much later than that. They are not Neanderthals; they just have a
different lineage. One thinks of Goliath and Og and Ishbi-benob for example.
Adam and Eve were taken from pre-adamic man in any event in the same surrogate
way that Jesus was taken from Joseph and Mary... 45 It is even so written:
The first man Adam became a living soul. The last Adam became a life-giving
spirit (1 Corinthians 15). Gabriel's Ransom
For there is one angel, one who is also a mediator between Jehovah
and Adam's sons, a Christ (Gabriel). Who gave himself a corresponding human soul
ransom for Adam's human soul covering all water baptized sons of Adam and all
water baptized pre-adamics. This master ransom covenant for Gabriel we call the HARC and the
universal righteousness covenant of the ransomee (Adam) we could call the 2RC
(This has nothing to do with Roman Catholics!) We use the acronym HARC because
of a certain hymn. Gabriel did not die as an angel in this ransom, but his first
human host (Methuselah) did, with Gabriel inside him at the time, in the year of
the flood, 2371BC. He would have died during the 40 days of rain of the flood
itself, between 2371Heshvan17 and 2371Chislev27, in order to save those from the
true religion in the Great Crowd during the greater flood of Armageddon.
Methuselah was non adamic - U506.
He would not have died judicially during the flood; he was not in need of any
judicial execution by God. The sons of the HARC have all been in a true
religion, they are all priests as Adam was, they get their edenic human bodies
courtesy of Gabriel through Methuselah's body, the longest living human to date
(he lived 969 years). Furthermore there has never been more water around
than in the flood and the HARC is entered through 'water' baptism. Pre-adamics
could enter the HARC and become sons of Adam under his subcovenant of the HARC.
And sons of Adam who did not get water baptized into the true religion at the
time but had faith, could enter the PARC. In fact, let’s reboot our brains shall we? Why is it that entry
to the 2AC is through water baptism? True a bath cleans away physical dirt from
the past which symbolizes fleshly sins committed in the past. But surely all
water baptisms point back to the flood? Surely Methuselah died by the waters of
the flood so that we might live through the waters of the Jordan, the bath of
the flesh. Michael's Ransom
For there is one angel, one who is also a mediator between Jehovah
and Adam's sons, Jesus (Michael). Who gave himself a corresponding angelic soul
ransom for Adam covering all spirit baptized sons of Adam and all spirit
baptized pre-adamics. This master ransom covenant we call the Angelic Ransom Covenant
(the ARC) and its universal righteousness covenant for Adam, we call the 3RC. In
all three covenant explanations above, and in many places in this website and in
the bible, 'sons' means 'sons and daughters'. The three master covenants above were made after Satan sinned and
so were made directly with God, without the Firstborn Master Covenant, which
Satan lost when he sinned. But after Jesus' death, any new covenant made with
God, must be made through Jesus, since he then became God's firstborn taking the
firstborn right which is to have the Firstborn Master Covenant which stipulates
that God must do everything through the firstborn. Since the word 'God' is
recited twice in the scripture... 5
For one God, one also a mediator of God and of men, man, Christ, Jesus. it must take a different meaning somewhere in the word symbolism,
to the meaning it takes in the literal interpretation. This is why we take 'One
God' to mean one God requiring worship in the literal meaning, and to mean 'one
angel' in the word three symbolic meanings of the scripture. The Blessings of the PARC the HARC and the ARC
Melchizedek's ransom provides a non ageing human soul for pre-adamic
men and for adamic sons of true faith or good conscience in the new system. The
Blessing of the PARC is a human resurrection into the Kingdom of God with a
perfect edenic body. Gabriel's ransom provides a non ageing human soul for the pre-adamics
and for Adam’s sons in the new system. The blessing of this covenant of water
baptism and of true religion is that one is a priest in this system, for every
Jew with faith would have evangelized about his God and could take people into
his household and have them circumcised, and one is a priest in the next system,
and one gets a human resurrection into the Kingdom of God with a perfect edenic
body. From a salvation standpoint, the PARC and the HARC provide the same
blessing. But they provide it to different groups and the HARC is a priestly
covenant, a covenant for those in the true religion. A priesthood is a non
genetic fathering, by providing entrance into a salvation covenant. Michael's ransom provides an everlasting angelic body for pre-adamics
and for Adam's sons in the new system. If Gabriel's ransom is applied during the Kingdom, which is the
same statement as, if Adam is resurrected into the Kingdom of God and since the
first will be last, he must be so resurrected, then those in Gehenna will not
benefit from this ransom, being under the second death, and so not entitled to
any body (human or angelic) at the time the ransom is carried out. This appears
to mean that all those in Gehenna can never be humans again! But they can be
angels again and if they are sons of Adam this will be through the ARC - U13a. Technical Note:
If Abraham's ransom by the human soul of Jesus, which we look at later, was
applied today, then all of his genetic descendants as well as all those in the
1AC would be resurrected (other than those in Gehenna). Gehenna is the means
which prevents resurrection when ransoms are applied. Likewise when Adam is
finally ransomed and thereby resurrected, all of his genetic and covenant
descendents who are not in Gehenna are resurrected. This is why he is
resurrected last after his sons. Fatherhood
Before Adam died, he had an indefinitely lasting human soul and an
associated angelic soul, since he was an uncondemned son of God - U190.
He lost both of these when he sinned. He therefore lost the right to pass these
souls to his kids through procreation. Michael ransomed Adam's angelic soul, and
Gabriel (in Methuselah) ransomed his indefinitely lasting human soul. By Michael
giving his angelic soul in death to God, he then liberated and actually
purchased Adam's angelic soul from God. In any event this procedure gave Michael
the right to father angelic sons to Adam, the right that Adam had lost. But
since it was a ransom of Adam, it was Adam's re-instatement as an angelic
father. So Jesus effectively gave Adam his fatherhood rights back and reclaimed
the procreative capability that Adam had lost. Jesus became Adam's angelic
father by covenant and he became his son in the sense that he could provide him
with angelic offspring. Hence his name 'the son of man'. Gabriel on the other
hand, by giving the non adamic human soul of Methuselah (with Gabriel in it at
the time), took Adam's human soul as a possession, 'as his own'. He then became
Adam's human soul father and purchased the rights to father Edenic human souls
to Adam's sons, the other right that Adam had lost; hence he is also a 'son of
man'. So in the Kingdom of God, our edenic human bodies are thanks to
Melchizedek or Gabriel and our angelic bodies are thanks to Michael, and the
whole exercise is thanks to our brilliant God. A God whose mercy is a
matter of heavenly legislation. Wouldst that we had such legislation in this
system, but there again it has a different God, so we have cruelty as a matter
of legislation instead. Michael died as an angel in Jesus going first to Tartarus, where
all the disembodied ex angelic souled spirits are - U251.
Gabriel did not die as an angel but died as a human in Methuselah, Gabriel's
spirit was preserved without being sent to Tartarus. It was simply transferred
into his angelic vehicle, his angelic soul, when the human soul of Methuselah
expired. So God covenanted with Michael first, when Satan sinned, and then
later with Gabriel and Melchizedek. God covenants with the Angelic Master
Mediator (Michael, Gabriel, Melchizedek) who then covenants with the human
universal righteousness mediator (Adam or his father) who then covenants with
the various system mediators (Enosh, Noah, Abraham etc) who then covenants with
a submediator (Moses, Ezra, John the Baptist, Jesus, Paul, Russell, Gordon etc.)
who then covenants with mankind. This arrangement of covenants reflects the role
of Jesus/Michael and of the two other master mediators, making the three
Cherubs. Seeing this clearly, Jesus made an agreement at the time of Adam's sin
with God that he would give his soul as a ransoming sacrifice, actually his
ever-living angelic soul. This was the basis of all of God's legal dealings with
mankind thereafter. This was 'The Covenant', and his angelic soul is 'The Ark'.
Had Jesus not made this agreement with God, then God would have been unable to
make any agreement with us at all, because none of us would ever have had the
capability of being his sons, because God's sons are angelic. God could not have
lifted the death penalty on any of us in the absence of the ARC. So all mediators between God and men are made possible by Jesus'
master mediation which was of the agreement, the covenant that he made to come
here and die for us, the ARC. It is all thanks to Jesus, the entire legal plan
from God rests squarely upon his shoulders. And just as all sacrifices under the
law of Moses pointed forward to his sacrifice, so all mediators of all covenants
between God and his people point backwards to Jesus' agreement to mediate for
all of us. He stepped in to save us from the murderous intentions of Satan at
short notice when we needed him. And we still do need him. It's like the
scripture says: 24 Then he favors him and
says, Let him off from going down into the pit! I have found a ransom!... 8 And I began to hear the
voice of Jehovah saying: Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? And I
proceeded to say: Here I am! Send me. 14 And toward them the
prophecy of Isaiah is having fulfillment, which says: By hearing, you will hear
but by no means get the sense of it; and, looking, you will look but by no means
see. So
when Jesus' parable states: 34 Then the king will say
to those on his right, Come, you who have been blessed by my Father, inherit the
kingdom prepared for you from the founding of the world (Matthew 25). 8
And all those who dwell on the earth will worship it; the name of not one of
them stands written in the scroll of life of the Lamb who was slaughtered, from
the founding of the world (Revelation 13). The lamb, Jesus, was slaughtered a long time after the founding of
the world, but the agreement for his slaughter was part of that founding. The
scroll of life was started at the founding of the world, which also was the
beginning of death for Adam and his sons. Obviously a scroll of life is
unnecessary before death becomes an issue. And this scroll was dependant on
Jesus' agreement to ransom Adam. As St Paul says: 21 For since death is
through a man, resurrection of the dead is also through a man. Moses is a typical example of how God deals with his people. When
the sons of Israel agreed to obey the 10 commandments and the Law of Moses, God
did not covenant directly with the sons of Israel, he covenanted with Moses, who
covenanted with the sons of Israel. We are all made alive in Jesus, because all
three covenants are part of the same redemption process. You may start with the
PARC or the HARC, but either you end up in the ARC or you end up in Gehenna (for
a long time). System
Mediators
The Master Mediators, Michael, Gabriel and Melchizedek, then form
covenants with the Universal Mediators (Adam and his dad, Abadam). These then
form covenants with System Mediators. A System Mediator is merely a man who
makes a covenant with a Universal Mediator (in fact there are 9 System Mediators
in all, 3 for each salvation covenant, and 3 for each of the pre-flood, peri-flood
and post flood systems. All System Mediators need to be non adamic or need to be
ransomed so as to be non adamic (actually they all need to be ransomed whether
adamic or non adamic it would appear). Then the System Mediators make covenants
with sub-mediators, who merely need to be born again. As regards the post flood
system, the Abrahamic system, there were 9 covenants made between God and
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, we state these here, they are explained and proven
from the scriptures later in this section: With
Abraham: With
Isaac: With
Jacob: Abraham is the System Mediator of the PARC for the post Abrahamic
system. The AFC, the covenant of Faith, the covenant of human resurrection into
the kingdom of God for those who never join a true religion, is his main
covenant. One race
does not need 3 fathers!
So now we finally know why one race, the Jews, needed 3 fathers.
The ancestry of the Jews explains the salvation of the Christians. Abraham is
the father of those with faith, Isaac is the father of those in the true
religion, and Jacob is the father of those resurrected as angels. The order of
progression is faith, truth, spirit. In fact the Macro Symbolism of the
Patriarchs of the Jews is as follows:
Isaac was non adamic - U506
and Sarah had stopped menstruating anyway. But Abraham and Jacob were adamic. In
fact Abraham was ransomed by the non adamic human Jesus Christ, and Jacob was
angelically ransomed by the associated angelic soul of the non adamic human John
the baptist. Isaac was ransomed by the human soul of John the baptist (although
we are not sure why this was necessary). 15 So that is why he is a
mediator of a new covenant, in order that, because a death [of John the
Baptist as a human, the mediator of the 1EC and the seemingly unnecessary
validation sacrifice for the ICC] has occurred for [their] release by ransom
[of Isaac] from the transgressions
[not of the conscience but of the
flesh] under the former covenant [the law subcovenant of the ICC],
the ones who have been called [into the 1NC subcovenant of the
JAC] might
receive the promise of the everlasting inheritance [this being the promise of
the ARC] (Hebrews 9). We had thought that Jesus validated the 1AC and John validated the
3AC. But one does not need two souls to ransom one man. Jesus validated the 1AC
by ransoming its System Mediator, Abraham. John validated the JAC by angelically
ransoming its System Mediator Jacob. John also validated the ICC by human
ransoming Issac. The JAC is a main covenant and is a subcovenant of the ARC, and
of the IAC which was a subcovenant of the 3AC. But the 3AC was not a subcovenant
of the ARC; it was a promise that one of Abraham's seed would be a System
Mediator of the ARC. Abraham was angelically ransomed by the ARC (through a
system covenant with Arpachsahd presumably). In fact all of the angelic visits
of Michael and Gabriel in non adamic humans, have to do with ransoming Adam or
System Mediators in the pre flood system, the peri flood system, or the post
flood system of Abraham. One can logically deduce that the ARC carried
obligations on Michael to turn up in various non adamic bodies and die ransoming
various System Mediators. And likewise the HARC did with Gabriel. Here is a
diagrammatic attempt to explain the covenant tree of the ARC as it applies to
the post flood system.
ARC (Master Covenant) Here
is an isomorphic diagrammatic representation of the Mediator family tree of the
ARC as it applies to the post flood system.
Michael (Master Mediator) Please
see sections [11]
and [32]
for a fuller explanation of these trees. In this way every System Mediator is a new Adam, being non adamic
either by birth or by an individual ransom in the form of a non adamic human
validation sacrifice. He is also a 'son of man'. He is then clean to pass on the
ransoming value of the ARC or the HARC to his kids by covenant. If a System Mediator was ransomed by the HARC directly, rather
than by a personal validation sacrifice, then he would terminate that line of
salvation. But being ransomed himself he can pass the salvation of the covenant
on to a covenanted group, so he is the beginning of a line of salvation rather
than the end of it. He is the originator of a family, rather than the last in a
line of covenanted ancestors. He is a link in the chain rather than an end of
the chain. Every member of the covenanted group is an end of the chain. System
Mediators start a covenant for a race, just as Adam started a race. A System
Mediator's salvation genealogy starts with him, not with someone above him in
covenant genealogy. Abraham was ransomed by Jesus, Isaac was ransomed by John
and Jacob was angelically ransomed by John, so that they could all start off
their own families. Abraham started the family of all those who lived during and
after him who are saved into the Kingdom of God in human bodies. Isaac started
the family of true worshippers in this system who become human priests in the
next. Jacob started the sub family of those of Abraham's sons who were to become
heavenly kings and God's angelic sons. The
3 Abrahamic Covenants and the Land and Circumcision Covenant (the 1AC, 2AC, 3AC
and LCC) The 4 covenants were made by God with Abraham as promises, so they
are also referred to as 'the promises' in the scriptures. None of these 4
covenants can be subcovenants of each other because they all have the same
mediator (Abraham). Neither are any of these 4 covenants further clauses in each
other, because there must be at least three promises/covenants since St. Paul
tells us... 17 By faith Abraham, when
he was tested, as good as offered up Isaac, and the man that had gladly received
the promises attempted to offer up [his] only-begotten [son] (Hebrews
11). This shows that at least 2 promises had been made before God made
the 3AC, which was made after he attempted to offer up Isaac. Since the
covenants apply to 4 different groups (the genetic sons of Abraham, Isaac and
Jacob and the main covenant sons of Abraham, the main covenant sons of Isaac and
the main covenant sons of Jacob), there must be 4 covenants. God says as
much... 24 In time God heard their
groaning and God remembered his covenant with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Exodus
2). 42 And I shall indeed
remember my covenant with Jacob, and even my covenant with Isaac and even my
covenant with Abraham I shall remember, and the land I shall remember (Leviticus
26). The Covenant of Exodus 2, with all three patriarchs, is the LCC,
or 'the land' in the terms of Leviticus 26. 'My covenant with Jacob' is the main
covenant of the JAC, 'my covenant with Isaac' is the main covenant of the ICC
and 'my covenant with Abraham' is the main covenant of the AFC. Covenants are not just boring biblical legal agreements, like the
European Union regulations on cucumbers. They are the legal basis for God's
dealings with mankind, which lead to his salvation, which is his resurrection
into the Kingdom of God, or his survival through Armageddon (which is actually a
living resurrection, called the rapture). They are the means by which God adopts
us as sons, enabling us to have the two souls and the that Adam lost and his
priesthood. We shall discover that God made a First Abrahamic Covenant (1AC),
a Second Abrahamic Covenant (2AC), a Third Abrahamic Covenant (3AC) and a
promised land and seed like dust of the earth and exclusivity on being God's
people covenant with a circumcision obligation (LDEGPCC?), let's call this the
Land and Circumcision Covenant, the LCC. For the story of the 6 subcovenants of each of the 2AC, the 3AC,
and the LCC please see section [32].
It is very important to realize that no group of men have any exclusivity on
God, but the sons of the LCC were exclusively God's people for a time. One of
the hardest things to get right in interpreting the scriptural statements of
these covenants is the various meanings of the ambiguous phrase 'your seed'.
Here are the meanings... 'Your seed'
is a singular
seed, such as a firstborn son to a father or a submediator to a System Mediator 'Your seed after you
according to your generations' is the immediate descendant chain. We must also remember that 'Abraham', to God can mean 'Abraham
himself', or 'Abraham and his sons' depending on the context. 'Your seed'
changes with time, being genetically Isaac, and then Jacob for example. 12 Then God said to
Abraham: Do not let anything that Sarah keeps saying to you be displeasing to
you about the boy and about your slave girl. Listen to her voice, because it is
by means of Isaac that what will be called your seed
[Jacob], will be
(Genesis 21). 16 Now the promises were
spoken to Abraham and to his seed. It says, not: And to seeds, as in the case of
many such, but as in the case of one: And to your seed, who is Christ (Galatians
3). The words 'And to your seed' are in the Genesis 13 land promise to
Abraham, the Genesis 26 land promise to Isaac and the Genesis 28 land promise to
Jacob. So Paul is saying that the final seed as regards the land promise, the
seed of Jacob as regards the land promise, is Jesus. So Jesus will be given the
Promised Land. He does not have it now of course. But he is given it in 2008
after this system ends. So here are the recitals of the patriarchal covenants in Genesis.
They are understated in the extreme. They have no advanced publicity, no
preceding media campaign, no fanfare, not so much as an introduction, and yet
they are the foundation of the entire future of mankind. For this is the modus
operandi of our God - no Oscar ceremony, no medal presentation, no orchestral
chorus, no status enhancing procedure to impress women or to impress men or to
impress the press, just true love: With
Abraham... 1 And Jehovah proceeded to
say to Abram: Go your way out of your land
(Cr))
and
from your relatives and from the house of your father to the land
(Cr))
that
I shall show you; 7 Jehovah now appeared to
Abram and said: To your seed [Isaac and his sons]
I am going to
give this land (Cr))
[under the LCC]
(Genesis 12). 14 And Jehovah said to
Abram after Lot had separated from him: Raise your eyes, please, and look from
the place where you are, northward and southward and eastward and westward, 5 Look up please to the
heavens and count the stars if you are possibly able to count them. And he went
on to say to him: So your seed
[through the 3AC] will become (Genesis
15). 17 The sun was now setting
and a dense darkness came and, look! A smoking furnace and a fiery torch that
passed in between these pieces. 1 When Abram got to be 99
years old, then Jehovah appeared to Abram and said to him: Walk before me and
prove yourself faultless, 17 And Jehovah said: Am I
keeping covered from Abraham what I am doing? 16 By myself I do
swear, is the utterance of Jehovah, that by reason of the fact that you have
done this thing and you have not withheld your son, your only one [I shall
not withhold from you my son, my only one], With
Isaac... 24 And Jehovah proceeded
to appear to him during that night and to say: I am the God of Abraham your
father. Do not be afraid, because I am with you, and I will bless you and
multiply your seed on account of Abraham my servant (Genesis 26). With
Jacob... 10
And God went on to say to him: Your name is Jacob. No longer is your name to be
called Jacob, but Israel will your name become. And he began to call his name
Israel. One might
think that the seed in Genesis 35 could be David, since he and Solomon became
the Kings over the entire Promised Land. But the LCC provides either for
displacement or total domination (slavery) by the seed and his sons over
everyone else in the Promised Land. It is the case that the sons of Jacob
dominated the Hivites; it is not the case the sons of David dominated the sons
of Israel or displaced them: 20
As for all the people remaining over from the Amorites, the Hittites, the
Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites, who were no part of the sons of
Israel, The
blessing on 'all the families of the ground' through Abraham and through Jacob
is the blessing of the 1AC, the AFC, the reward for true faith. The slightly
less universal blessing on 'all the nations of the earth', through Abraham and
through Isaac, is the blessing of the 2AC, the ACC, the blessing of all those
who join a true religion, a true church. For this blessing occurred because:
You/Abraham listened to my voice. And those who listen to the voice of God join
the true church. And the true churches are the 'nations of the earth', where
earth means God's administration. In fact, even in the literal meaning, 'earth'
means 'true religious administration' in the patriarchal covenants. The
salvation blessings of the 1AC and the 2AC are both a human resurrection into
the Kingdom of God in an edenic (indefinitely lasting) human body. But the
2AC also provides entry to the true religion in this system and gives a
priesthood in the next. To
see that the 1AC is a covenant of faith consider Paul's explanations in
Galatians 3 in Romans 3 and in Romans 4. Here is Paul's explanation in Galatians
3 of the man with faith who was not said to be in a true religion: 6
Just as Abraham was faithful to the God, and it was counted to him as
righteousness
[this being
what the PARC is all about]. Paul
himself says in the next chapter that the law was made at Mount Sinai in Arabia
(and therefore on 1513Sivan3), not in Egypt at the time of the passover (around
1513Nisan10) when the sons of Israel bowed low in acceptance of the passover
festival statutes... 24
These things stand as a symbolic drama for these [women] mean two covenants, the
one from Mount Sinai, which brings forth children for slavery, and which is
Hagar (Galatians 4). Here is
Paul's explanation in Romans 3: 22
Yes, God's righteousness through the faith in Jesus Christ, for all those having
faith. For there is no distinction
[between Jew or Greek, between true religion or false
religion when it comes to faith]. 6
Just as David also speaks of the happiness of the man to whom God counts
righteousness apart from works: So
everyone who has true faith (or actually a good conscience) is in the AFC (the
1AC) under the PARC and has the first happiness of David through faith not
works. These then are the sons of Abraham through his main covenant. Those of
this group who act on true faith by joining the true congregation of God, which
is the congregation of those who have gained entry to the 2AC, the ACC, through
the ICC, are the sons of Isaac. They attain righteousness in the flesh through
abstaining from bad works according to the rules of the true congregation. Those
in the 1AC or in the 2AC can then go on to attain the second happiness of David,
which is to have a clean conscience, to have all ones sins forgiven until time
indefinite. Such people are born again and have gained entry into the 3AC (the
AAC) through the JAC. These then are the sons of Jacob by covenant and the sons
of Jesus the eternal father through the ARC. Just
as Melchizedek presides over the entry of Gabriel into his host, who then
presides over the entry of Michael into his host - U506
(although once, the first time, it went Melchizedek Michael Gabriel as it
sometimes does with the PARC the ARC and the HARC). So Melchizedek mediated the
master covenant of faith (PARC) and he provides entry to the true Christian
congregation, who are the beneficiaries of the ransom of Gabriel, the master
mediator of the covenant for all true religions (the HARC), through the main
covenant of the second blessing of Abraham (the 2AC, the ACC). And the Christian
congregation provides entry into God's family by being born again and gaining a
new angelic body as a host for the spirit, this being the blessing of the 3AC,
the AAC, through the JAC, thanks to the ransom of Michael under the ARC. So
this really is the largest understanding that the LWs have at this time. The
prophetic drama enacted by Melchizedek, Gabriel and Michael, each time the three
of them appear, is symbolically describing the detail of God's legal plan for
man's salvation through the PARC, the HARC and the ARC or for those in the post
Abrahamic system through the 1AC, the 2AC and the 3AC respectively. For example
it was Simeon, who was Melchizedek, who presided over the entry of Gabriel into
John the Baptist, and it was Gabriel in John's body who presided over the
entrance of Michael into Jesus' body at his baptism - U506. 25
And, look! there was a man in Jerusalem named Simeon, and this man was righteous
and reverent, waiting for Israel's consolation, and holy spirit was upon him. Whereas
Melchizedek said:
Blessed be the most high God (Genesis
14:20). The 1AC
covers faith outside the true religion, the 2AC covers all true religions
The Second
Abrahamic Covenant, the Abrahamic Church Covenant, is the means for all men and
women (who became 20 years old after the covenant came into force) officially to
gain citizenship of the Kingdom of God, and is the legal basis of every true
religion, from the time of Abraham until today. Abraham is effectively the
Ambassador of the Kingdom of God on earth. He can grant us a visa to immigrate
into that Kingdom, through his second covenant. Entrance to the 2AC (Second
Abrahamic Covenant) is through baptism in water in the Christian congregation,
and was through the 20th passover for the Jewish congregation. It is a cleansing
of the flesh, a forgiveness of the sins in the past. This is why Genesis 24, the
account of Isaac's marriage to Rebekah, and Genesis 26 which defines the ICC are
all about water and wells. 'Water' is mentioned 18 times in Genesis 24 and
4 times in Genesis 26, and 'well' is mentioned twice in Genesis 24 and 7 times
in Genesis 26. Paul says, referring to those in the first True Christian
Congregation (TCC1)... 28
Now we, brothers, are children belonging to the promise the same as Isaac was
(Galatians 4). This
promise was the 2AC, the ACC, the Abrahamic Church Covenant, that all the
nations of the earth should be blessed through Abraham's seed, who was Isaac in
this case. The ACC was a promise for the main covenant of Isaac, the ICC, the
Isaaic Church Covenant. Zechariah,
John’s dad, prophesied about his son saying: 70
Just as he, through the mouth of his holy prophets from of old, has spoken The holy
covenant sworn to Abraham referred to here must involve 'forefathers' plural. It
was the Second Abrahamic Covenant for a priesthood in the Kingdom of God
(rendering sacred service fearlessly), through Isaac - U9. One cannot fearlessly render service to God in this
system, because becoming a true Christian involves persecution which will of
necessity involve an element of fear. Jesus confirms this saying: 38
And whoever does not accept his torture stake and follow after me is not worthy
of me (Matthew 10). Therefore
this fearless service is occurring in the Kingdom of God after we have been
rescued from the hands of our enemies, the chief one of whom is Satan. Our
rescue from him is the battle of Armageddon, wherein Satan tries to kill us all
because if he can't rule us then no one will rule us as far as he is concerned.
This battle is the entrance into God’s kingdom which last’s 1,000 years
during which time Satan is dead! Thank God one might say. So
the 2AC is the covenant by which the true people of God are officially given a
new non ageing human body in the Kingdom of God and have a priesthood in that
Kingdom under which they can render sacred service to God fearlessly. They get
this honor because they render sacred service to him fearfully in this system in
a true religion. So the 2AC is a subcovenant of the HARC mediated by Gabriel who
'Stands near before God' (Luke 1:19), and therefore is one serious priest!. But
in every nation on this earth there are the illegal immigrants. These people are
in such a dire situation in their own nations or are so desperate, or so keen to
advance themselves that they find a way into a new country without the proper
papers. Nearly all the nations of this earth permit this to some extent,
although it is a source of great public debate. God, who is certainly more
merciful than human governments, also permits this. But of course he cannot
condone unrighteousness, so there is a legal provision for these 'illegal
immigrants' (illegal only in the sense that they never joined any true
religion). This is actually the PARC and for the post Abrahamic system the 1AC,
its subcovenant. The PARC provides entrance into the Kingdom for mislead
believers, those who make themselves God's people by a sincere but misplaced or
unfulfilled faith. They do want to gain entry to the Kingdom of God as all
illegal immigrants do, but their faith either in humanity itself (which is a
form of faith in God) which gives them a good conscience or their true faith, is
not acted upon in such a way that they join a true religion if that is possible
during the time that they live. Let us be clear about this, the test on mankind
is a spiritual test. No one is saved who does not have some type of
faith. For the existence and the development of faith is the spiritual
test. For your faith reveals your hearts true desire. These
anabaptized believers are prefigured by the Sons of Israel in the LCC.
Incidentally this book/site uses the term 'Jew' to mean a 'true' son of Abraham,
'true seed' through one or other of the Abrahamic covenants (as do the
scriptures). Strictly a Jew is a citizen of the Southern Kingdom of Israel, the
Kingdom of Judah, or a member of the tribes of Judah or Benjamin, the two tribes
in the Southern Kingdom of Israel. The
sons of Israel were a people all chosen by God, but they did not all get into
the Kingdom of God. They were all in the LCC, but they were not all in the 2AC.
Every Jew entered the 2AC at his/her 20th passover celebration. But to stay in
the 2AC one had to keep the law of Moses, or at least make the right sacrifice
when one did not. Most of the citizens of Israel failed to do this. But many of
those who never stayed in the 2AC, by adhering to the Law of Moses as
administered by the human priests in the temple, will still be saved. These ones
were saved by the angels, who continually watched their faith and belief and
works and permitted Satan to test them, and chose those who demonstrated the
required qualities. These guys were invisibly saved. In this sense they are the
illegal immigrants from the Jewish system. They were good guys but unrighteous.
Good soil for hearts, good hearted, but not fine soil, which is righteous
hearted - see [70].
Really they were the rough diamonds. The same is true today. The believers, who
fail to join a true religion, are saved through the 1AC under the PARC. If you
like, they follow after Winston Churchill, who declared himself to be more of a
buttress than a pillar to the church. He supported it from the outside. No
uncircumcised man could enter the 2AC until the conversion of Cornelius. Today
the 'Jew' is the believer (in God or mankind), and the 'Gentile' is the
unbeliever, and the circumcision is no longer of the foreskin, but of the heart.
It is as Paul said, referring to the 1AC:
25
Circumcision is, in fact, of benefit only if you practice law but if you are a
transgressor of law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. Paul
wrote this after the LCC had been set aside, it had ended, in the sense that one
could no longer enter it. But the 1AC did not end when circumcision ended. The
LCC ended with the conversion of Cornelius, a Roman, in 36Tishri. The Law
covenant ended when Jesus nailed it to the stake, in the sense Jews were no
longer required to enter the Law covenant at that time, and in the sense that
those in the Law could leave it through baptism into the 2AC, and in the sense
the Law became a false religion. Although the Law was still in force over those
circumcised ones and women who entered it before Jesus died, until the temple
was destroyed in 70 CE by General Titus (unless these people chose to get
baptized in the water baptism of John, which was their release from the law).
After the LCC ended one could have Jehovah as one's God officially, without
actually being a Jew, and the Jews lost their right to the promised land.
Actually they were denied occupation of the promised land until 1917 through the
curse of the law of Moses on Leviticus 26 - U121. God's
people then became the believers in the two new commandments of his son, namely
that we should love God and love our neighbor as our self. God's people became
simply the good guys, the loving guys, the two step thinking guys, the guys who
act in the common interest rather than those who act in their own self interest.
People who understand that the big picture affects the little picture. People
who realize that our only hope as a community is to act in the interest of the
community. For those who take the narrow path to salvation need broad vision or
they will fall off it, whereas those who take the broad road to destruction need
only have narrow vision and they are the majority in this system. The
1AC is all about the circumcision of the heart, but this hidden covenant had a
temporary physicalization in the LCC in the case of the genetic sons of
Abraham. It is a subcovenant of the PARC and the 1RC The
2AC covers all those who enter the true church (those who kept the law, or those
who were water baptized into a true Christian church and kept the law of that
church). It is a subcovenant of the HARC and the 2RC The
3AC covers all those after Abraham who are born again, those who are baptized in
holy spirit. It is a subcovenant of the ARC and the 3RC. Not
everyone who enters the 1AC gets saved, not everyone who enters the 2AC gets
saved and not everyone who enters the 3AC gets saved. All three covenants
involve an entrance, a test, and a pass or a fail. In the case of the 1AC and
the 3AC the test is one of faith, and once you fail, by permanently losing your
faith, as judged by the angels, you are finished, it's Gehenna for you. But in
the case of the 2AC, the test is one of works, which are judged by men in a true
religion. In the case of the 2AC, if you screw up, you get chucked out, but can
come back in later, if repentant. So failure is not necessarily terminal. But a
circumcision cannot be done twice!! Anything judged by men cannot be terminal.
This is why the physical death penalty is not appropriate today; our legal
systems are just not accurate enough for such a terminal penalty. The 2AC
is the mechanism whereby men get a piece of God's salvation action, which is
what a true religion is all about. The Word
Symbolism of the Land Promise of Genesis 13
14
And Jehovah said to Abram after Lot had separated from him: Raise your eyes,
please, and look from the place where you are, northward and southward and
eastward and westward, In
the word symbolism [land (1), dust (2), seed (3)], another seed becomes the
greater dust particles (Edenic dust particles) and gets the same land (in the
Kingdom of God). In the Kingdom of God one can see north, south, east and west,
all over the whole planet! The promised land is not given to Jesus during this
system, but it ceases belonging to the sons of Jacob when the LCC ends. The
nations destroyed when the sons of Israel took the Promised Land the blessing of
the LCC
17
The sun was now setting and a dense darkness came and, look! A smoking furnace
and a fiery torch that passed in between these pieces. When
the sons of Israel took the promised land they destroyed 6 of these nations and
the Hivites: 1 When Jehovah your God at
last brings you into the land to which you are going so as to take possession of
it, he must also clear away populous nations from before you, the Hittites and
the Girgashites and the Amorites and the Canaanites and the Perizzites and the
Hivites and the Jebusites, seven nations more populous and mighty than you are
(Deuteronomy 7). The
Hivites were friendly to the sons of Israel and concluded a covenant with them
to be their servants. The account is in Joshua 9. Here are some highlights: 7 At this the men of
Israel said to the Hivites: Perhaps it is in our vicinity that you are dwelling.
So how could we conclude a covenant with you? 15 And Joshua went making
peace with them and concluding a covenant with them to let them live, and so the
chieftains of the assembly swore to them. 17 Then the sons of Israel
pulled out and came to their cities on the third day, and their cities were
Gibeon and Chephirah and Beeroth and Kiriath-jearim (Joshua 9). 23 And now you are cursed
people, and a slave's position and being gatherers of wood and drawers of water
for the house of my God will never be cut off from you (Joshua 9). The Kenites, the Kenizzites and the Kadmonites (we presume) were also friendly to
the sons of Israel: 6 Meanwhile Saul said to
the Kenites: Go depart, go down from the midst of the Amalekites, that I may not
sweep you away with them. As for you, you exercised loving-kindness with all the
sons of Israel at the time of their coming up out of Egypt. So the Kenites
departed from the midst of Amalek (1 Samuel 15:6). 12 All the royal realm of
Og in Bashan, who reigned in Ashtaroth and in Edrei he it was who remained of
what was left of the Rephaim and Moses went striking them and dispossessing them
(Joshua 13). So
the promised land was not all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates at
all, it was merely the lands occupied by the 10 nations recited in Genesis 15.
These lands presumably stretched from the Nile to the Euphrates. 1 And it came about after
the death of Moses the servant of Jehovah that Jehovah proceeded to say to
Joshua the son of Nun, the minister of Moses: 4 Then to Isaac I gave
Jacob and Esau. Later to Esau I gave Mount Seir to take possession of it; and
Jacob and his sons went down to Egypt (Joshua 24). 17 And these are the years
of Ishmael's life, 137 years. Then he expired and died and was gathered to his
people. Now
Paul tells us by comparison with the 1AC, which was validated by God and does
not have any additional or set aside clauses, that another covenant, which must
be the LCC, has additional clauses and is later set aside entirely: 15 Brothers, I speak with
a human illustration: A validated covenant, though it is a man's, no one sets
[it] aside or attaches additions to it (Galatians 3). The LCC was validated by God in Genesis 15, with a fiery furnace.
The 1AC, which Paul is referring to by contrast was validated by Jesus and has
no additions and is not set aside. Neither does the 3AC have additions, nor
neither is it set aside. It appears that Ishmael and Abraham's non Jacobian
seed, who had the obligation to be circumcised but had no law so they got some
of the greater promised land (Edom etc) but they had no earthly administration
(symbolic land) and hence they could behave like wild asses. But they too were
God's covenanted people and he was their God until the LCC ended. After this
they mainly became Muslims it would appear. There is no point in being
circumcised and being a Muslim (or indeed in being circumcised any more since
that covenant has ended). All
scriptures were written by Jews
Jacob
then Jesus are the two descendants/seeds in the 3AC, and of course the
scriptures, every single holy word of them, were through Jesus and through
Jacob: 1 What, then, is the
superiority of the Jew, or what is the benefit of the circumcision? Summary
The three ransom provisions for mankind made in the PARC and HARC
and the ARC are passed on to all men by the 3 righteousness covenant for their
ransomees, the 1RC, 2RC and 3RC. Then in the post flood system they are passed
on through the 1AC, the 2AC and the 3AC respectively. Those with true faith or a
good conscience enter the PARC and the 1RC through the 1AC. Those who act on
their true faith in the right circumstances enter a true religion which is the
entrance into the 2AC, which is a subcovenant of the 2RC which is the universal
righteous covenant of the HARC. Those who continue to act on their faith in the
right circumstances are born again, by entering the 3AC which is a subcovenant
of the 3RC which is the subcovenant of the ARC. One can be born again directly
from the PARC without entering a true religion. But everyone who is sanctified
in holy spirit, born again, does have to enter a true religion during their test
and before they are sealed for everlasting life, being declared righteous in
spirit. If a born again person does not find the true religion he finds Gehenna. The pre-adamics interbred sufficiently to become adamic as regards
the covenants by the time that the LCC ended. The LCC is the covenant described
by Paul as having additions and being set aside. The LCC was promised in
Genesis12:7 a few months after 1943Nisan14, when Abraham crossed the Euphrates
to put the first promise into force. This was 430 years before the law covenant
was made on 1513Sivan3, so presumably it was promised in 1943Sivan.. The Legal Status of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob
Abraham himself is angelically ransomed by the ARC, and is human
soul ransomed by the human body Jesus, the validation sacrifice for the 1AC. He
mediates the human soul ransom of Jesus through the 1AC which is a subcovenant
of the PARC. Isaac was non adamic and needed no ransom. He mediates/fathers his
edenic human soul to the sons of the ICC, which is a subcovenant of the HARC. He
again is angelically ransomed by the ARC Jacob is angelically ransomed by the associated angelic soul of
John the baptist, the validation sacrifice of the JAC. He mediates the angelic
soul ransom of the ARC through the JAC. When God said: I am God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, he meant that
they were all three his sons as Adam was. The LCC ended with the conversion of Cornelius, Jesus will own the
Promised Land in the Kingdom of God
We know that the LCC was to be 'set aside' since it is compared to
the 1AC which is not set aside in Galatians 3. This obviously occurred when the
first uncircumcised man became one of God's people, being baptized by Peter in
water after the gifts of the spirit fell upon him and his house in the presence
of Peter. This was the conversion of the Roman officer Cornelius in Acts 10, the
apostle Peter said: 34 At this Peter opened
his mouth and said: For a certainty I perceive that God is not partial, 48 With that he commanded
them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they requested him
to remain for some days (Acts 10). 27 And he must keep [the]
covenant in force for the many for one 7 and at the half of the 7 he will cause
sacrifice and gift offering to cease (Daniel 9). The
seven here is 7 years from 29Tishri to 36Tishri, in the middle of which Jesus
died and ended all valid sacrifices under the law of Moses.
The
First Abrahamic Covenant Abraham was chosen by God to be
the physical progenitor of the race of people to whom his son Jesus would be
born. The race of people known later as the Jews. He was also chosen by God to
be the mediator of the covenant (the biblical name for a binding agreement)
between God and mankind through which all the families of the ground would bless
themselves: 1 And Jehovah proceeded to
say to Abram: Go your way from your land/country (Cr))
and
from your relatives and from the house of your father to the land/country
(Cr))
that I shall show you; This is an ambiguously written scripture. Obviously the ‘great
nation’ were the sons of Israel in the literal meaning. But this scripture,
since the word 'land' appears twice in it, has a greater word symbolic meaning
by the Symbolic
Structure Principle. There is a further fulfillment of a 'great
nation' out of Abraham. This is the Great Crowd of Revelation 7:9 who are the
survivors of Armageddon, the greater Exodus, not out of Egypt, but out of this
system of things. The country that Abraham left was actually Mesopotamia. The
country that God showed him was Canaan, the promised land. The account of this
vital covenant is written very similarly to the account of Cain and Abel in
Genesis 4. It just look’s like God, for no apparent reason at all, arbitrarily
decided that he was going to bless this chap Abraham to the limit. There are two
questions therefore that are begging to be asked: [1]
Why did God choose Abraham in particular? The answer to the first question is seen by Abraham’s actions
after he was chosen. He was a very spiritual man. When he was asked by God to
kill his firstborn son Isaac, he reasoned that God could raise him from the dead
so he went ahead with the request (although God stopped him at the last minute).
It is important to realize that Isaac went along voluntarily out of love for
God, love for his dad, and his own spiritual vision, so at the worst this was an
assisted suicide. 17 By faith Abraham, when
he was tested, as good as offered up Isaac, and the man that had gladly received
the promises attempted to offer up [his] only-begotten [son], Abraham used his powers of reason to see, with the eyes of his
mind, things that were invisible. His sons today have the same foresight and
hence the same faith, that God did raise another of his sons, Jesus, from the
dead. St. Paul described Abraham as follows: 10 For he was awaiting the
city having real foundations, the builder and maker of which [city] is God
(Hebrews 11). The
answer to the second question is found by the application of the Jigsaw
Principle: What
is the blessing that all of the families of the ground would get from the 1AC
and the Nations of the earth will get from the 2AC? Well we already know the answer to these questions because the 1AC
is a subcovenant of the PARC and the 2AC is a subcovenant of the HARC. But let
us examine these blessings in more detail. The significance of God’s first
covenant (sometimes called his first promise) with Abraham is described by St.
Paul in Galatians 3:3-29. We only need to look at a few aspects of his
explanation at this point: 7 Surely you know that
those who adhere to faith are the ones who are sons of Abraham. 13 But when you spread a
feast, invite poor people, crippled, lame, blind; 14 The purpose was that
the blessing of Abraham might come to be by means of Jesus Christ for the
nations, that we might receive the promised spirit through our faith (Galatians
3). The
blessing of Abraham is the resurrection into the Kingdom of God on earth through
the 1AC and the PARC. As
an example of the 1AC in action consider the repentance of Zaccheus: 8 But Zacchaeus stood up
and said to the Lord: Look! The half of my belongings, Lord, I am giving to the
poor, and whatever I extorted from anyone by false accusation I am restoring
fourfold. He was a son of Abraham physically before the day when he gave
half of his belongings to the poor. He could not have become again a son of the
Second Abrahamic Covenant by repenting and obeying the law of Moses, since the
law lost water baptism power in 25Tishri. So his salvation was that he completed
his test of faith under the 1AC. So being a party to the First Abrahamic
Covenant (1AC) means that you gain salvation, which means that you have (an
unofficial from a true religion standpoint) visa to enter the Kingdom of God,
which means that either you will be resurrected into it if you die before
Armageddon, or you will survive Armageddon. So
now we can understand what St. Paul meant when he said: 29 Moreover, if you belong
to Christ
[he is your father, you are spirit baptized, born again], you
are really Abraham's seed, heirs with reference to a promise [the 3AC]
(Galatians 3). Heirs of Jesus’ sacrifice are in Jesus’ will if you like,
having the inheritance from his death, which is of course life, the second life,
in the Kingdom of God. The promise in this case is the Third Abrahamic Covenant,
because the blessing is through seed not through Abraham. But all of Abraham’s
seed are: ‘Heirs with reference to a promise’ Those in the 1AC are heirs of the PARC and of Jesus' validation
sacrifice (Jesus' human body died when he was impaled. This death validated the
1AC and bisected it - see [15].
They are heirs with reference to the 1AC promise. Those in the LCC are heirs of the Abraham himself with reference
to the land promise. Those in the 2AC are heirs of the HARC with reference to the
second promise. Those in the 3AC are heirs of the ARC with reference to the third
promise. Abraham’s ‘sons’ through his 3rd covenant get the same
blessing as Abraham himself got through his faith, namely they are living to God
(i.e. they are dead to us but actually alive in angelic bodies but asleep
awaiting a resurrection). Their angels look to God just like our children look
to us in the middle of the night. For more on this - see [190]: 37 But that the dead are
raised up even Moses disclosed, in the account about the thornbush, when he
calls Jehovah 'the God of Abraham and God of Isaac and God of Jacob.' All three are to be resurrected, because they are spiritually
living to God (living as spirit creatures, living as sleeping angels), though
physically dead to us. In summary, those who enter the first Abrahamic covenant, and
remain in it, are declared righteous (in the flesh) by God, and so are
resurrected, and this means that they gain citizenship of the Kingdom of God on
earth. Those who enter the 2nd Abrahamic covenant, and remain in it, are
declared righteous in the flesh by God and gain citizenship of the kingdom of
God on earth as priests. Those who enter the 3rd Abrahamic covenant, and remain
in it, are declared righteous in the spirit by God and have everlasting life.
All of these sons of Abraham enter the Kingdom of God (whether in heaven or on
earth) by resurrection. Even those who enter it through Armageddon get a living
resurrection, in the form of the rapture of 1 Thessalonians 4, when they are
converted into angels without dying, on the fly, as it were. So being
resurrected is how one becomes a citizen of the kingdom of God. Abraham’s true seed by the 1AC, 2AC
and the 3AC covenants are God’s true people, God’s true children, just as
the sons of the LCC were: Now that we have all 4 Abrahamic covenants in perspective, we see
that a son of the 1AC, 2AC or 3AC is just as much a son of Abraham as a son of
the LCC was. Of course the former are sons by faith and the latter are sons by
genetics. But all 4 are sons by covenant, and that is the big picture. So a
'Jew' today, taking the term' Jew' to mean true child of God, which means a true
Christian, is still in fact a son of Abraham just as the original Jews were, but
by Covenant. Le plus ca change the plus c'est la meme chose. Paul
then confirms that Abraham is the father of all of God's children saying: 16 ....He is the father
of us all, This
fatherhood is through the 1AC, the covenant of faith for us all. So
'Jew' just means any child of Abraham by any of his 3 covenants. Now we can
understand Jesus' words in Revelation: 9 I know your tribulation
and poverty--but you are rich--and the blasphemy by those who say they
themselves are Jews, and yet they are not but are a synagogue of Satan
(Revelation 2). 9 Look! I will give those
from the synagogue of Satan who say they are Jews, and yet they are not but are
lying--look! I will make them come and do obeisance before your feet and make
them know I have loved you (Revelation 3). These
scriptures do not refer to literal Jews, but to Abraham's true children, God's
true people. How
does one enter into the First and the Second Abrahamic Covenants? Abraham left Haran in Mesopotamia, and set off for the promised
land of Greater Canaan, which extended from the Euphrates to the Nile (as we can
see from the LCC). So when he crossed the Euphrates he did not validate the 1AC
but he inaugurated it, since the promise was conditional upon him making that
trip: 2 He said: Men, brothers
and fathers, hear. The God of glory appeared to our forefather Abraham while he
was in Mesopotamia, before he took up residence in Haran, and he said to him: 2 And Joshua went on to
say to all the people: This is what Jehovah the God of Israel has said, It was
on the other side of the River that your forefathers dwelt a long time ago,
Terah the father of Abraham and the father of Nahor, and they used to serve
other gods. 17 The sun was now setting
and a dense darkness came and, look! A smoking furnace and a fiery torch that
passed in between these pieces. So the river of Joshua 24 was the Euphrates, the northern boundary
of the promised land. Symbolically we are being told by Abraham's actions that
one enters the 1AC by crossing a river, which is the symbolism of baptism. But
God did not conclude the LCC with Abraham until after he had entered Canaan. So
he entered Canaan and he inaugurated the 1AC in uncircumcision. So he was
walking by faith without being in any kind of true Abrahamic religion at that
time. He was in fact in the true religion that had Melchizedek as its priest as
can be seen from Genesis 14. 18 And Melchizedek, King
of Salem, brought out the bread and wine, and he was priest of the Most High
God. Also we have no reason to believe that Abraham even got wet when
he crossed the Euphrates. One imagines that he used a bridge for his household.
So the 1AC is just entered into by having faith and permanently grasped by
acting on that faith. This faith is not the faith of your homeland or of your
relatives or of your father, it is your faith, unique to you. Most people choose
the religion of their nation, or of their relatives or of their father. The true
son of Abraham under the 1AC chooses the religion that he believes God is
showing him. This does not have to be the true church in the case of the 1AC. Now John the baptist on the other hand baptized people into the
2AC, the true religion. These people were already genetic sons of Abraham and
therefore in the LCC. 7 When he caught sight of
many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to the baptism, he said to them: You
offspring of vipers, who has intimated to you to flee from the coming wrath? 16 The Law and the
Prophets were until John. From then on the kingdom of God is being declared as
good news, and every sort of person is pressing forward toward it (Luke 16). 12
But from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of the heavens is
the goal toward which men press, and those pressing forward are seizing it
(Matthew 11). So John was starting a process through which men press forward
into the kingdom of God and eventually seize it. John was producing 'stones'.
Stones make up a temple, a temple of true worship. So this process is the
baptism into the 2AC, the Abrahamic Church Covenant, the ACC, and then the
completion of the baptism, the sealing, which is in fact a righteous decree or
declaration from God in the flesh - see [12,13].
Because the 2AC is the only way to get the blessing of Abraham (officially),
which is citizenship of the Kingdom of God. John was in fact producing dead
stones, judicially dead, because none of them had yet been born again. Later
Jesus built another temple with living stones, those who had been born again. 5 You yourselves also as
living stones are being built up a spiritual house for the purpose of a holy
priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus
Christ (1 Peter 2). Unofficial
salvation through the 1AC under the PARC The Second Abrahamic
Covenant is the true God’s way of granting a visa to allow immigration into
the Kingdom of God. Those who enter into that covenant with God and do not break
it are the 'legal' immigrants into the new system. There are also the 'illegal'
immigrants if you like. Those who are saved by the angels on the basis of their
faith or their conscience, or their love, or their distaste for the rotten
things of the world without ever joining any true religion, for St. Paul has
said: 14 For whenever people of
the nations that do not have law do by nature the things of the law, these
people, although not having law are a law to themselves. 15 And I have hope toward
God, which hope these [men] themselves also entertain, that there is going to be
a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous (Acts 24). It is very important to realize that one does not have to join any
religion in order to be saved by God. In fact more are saved who have never
joined a true religion than are saved who have. This understanding destroys the
Catholic and the Jehovah's Witness and many other religions' scare tactics that
you will burn in hell (Catholic - although they are dropping this tactic
presently), or at least not be resurrected (JW) if you do not join us! Lies,
lies lies! What man is there who can restrict the mercy of God? However if you
deny his existence then how are you entitled to his mercy? Technical note
The circumcised Jews in the LCC were automatically entered into
the Second Abrahamic Covenant through the Law covenant at the passover in their
20th year once the promised land had been entered. Rather than being
baptized in water, as a symbolic representation of being washed in the blood of
Abraham, they were baptized with the blood of the passover lamb, one for each
house, symbolically representing a washing with the blood of Moses. The priest
for this baptism was the head of the household. Under law, having defiled one's
flesh, i.e. broken one's baptism, one was washed again in the blood of Moses,
which was symbolically represented through the blood of the animal that was
sacrificed. John the baptist was achieving the same cleanliness through washing
in water. Although both are just symbolic representations for a washing in the
blood of a mediator, which is what a baptism is. John was actually washing
people in the blood of Isaac, who was the validation sacrifice for the 1AC,
Jehovah - Jireh (God will provide). He died of old age but was non adamic - see U506.
John started baptizing 4 years before the human blood of Jesus was available.
Those who left Egypt aged 20 years old or more were baptized into Moses by means
of the cloud and the sea, this was a baptism into the name of Father Abraham
too, since the Law of Moses was a subcovenant of the ICC and the 2AC. But those
who failed to keep the law then fell out of the ACC. The Date of the First Abrahamic covenant
For a full explanation of this Chronology - see [91].
The simplest way one can get to this date (that we are aware of) is by starting
with either the date of the fall of Jerusalem to Nebuchadnezzar in the 19th year
of his reign, which was 586 BC, a date which is relatively undisputed amongst
historians - see [99],
and counting back to the first year of Jehoiakim the king of Judah, which was
607. We then use Ezekiel's prophetic 390 year siege of Jerusalem in Ezekiel
chapter 4 to count back to the last year of Solomon in 997 - see [121]. We then count back to the first year of Solomon as being 1036
since he reigned for 40 years, so that his 40th was 997. Then we calculate that
his 4th regnal year was 1033, and we use: 1
And it came about in the 480th year after the sons of Israel came out from the
land of Egypt, in the 4th year, in the month of Ziv, that is, the second month,
after Solomon became king over Israel, that he proceeded to build the house to
Jehovah (1 Kings 6). So the 4th year of Solomon was the 480th after the Exodus, so 1033
was the 480th year after the exodus so 1513 was the zeroth year after the exodus
which is the year of the exodus. From this we deduce the original passover in
Egypt, the last of the 10 plagues where the firstborn sons of every Egyptian
man, and the firstborn or every beast of theirs died, was on 1513Nisan14 (30th
March 1513 BC). (The passover is always on Nisan14, Nisan is the first month of
the Hebrew year - see BLC). Actually it is quite amazing but the passover in the
year 33 AD when Jesus died started at 6pm on March 31st Gregorian, and the BLC
program can be up to 11 hours out in terms of Lunar phase data back at 1513 BC. It can be up to 15 hours out in 1943BC and up to 2½ hours out in
33CE - http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/phase.
The new moon was at 16:46 GMT according to Fred Espinak of Nasa on March 30th
Julian or March 16th Gregorian in 1513BC. If we move it forwards by 11 hours,
then it would be at 3:46 on March 17th GMT or 5:46 Jerusalem Time, and 30 hours
later is 11:46 am on March 18th, meaning that Nisan1 would start at 6pm on March
18th so Nisan14 would start at 6pm on March 31st. So it is possible that both
passovers were on the same solar day (March 31st)! We
then consider the following chronological scriptures: The passover but not the law came into being in Exodus 12, on 1513Nisan14: 24 And you must keep this
thing as a regulation for you and your sons to time indefinite. The bowing low was an implicit agreement. The full law was agreed
initially on 1513Sivan3. So 1513Nisan14 was the birth of the Jewish passover,
but the law was not agreed to as a covenant until 1513Sivan3 (18th May 1513 BC)
after the ten commandments were given. So 430 years before this puts us in the
years from 1944Tishri to 1943Tishri. Now Moses said at the first passover: 40 And the dwelling of the
sons of Israel who had dwelt in Egypt was 430 years. So since in 1513Nisan there was an exodus from Egypt that occurred
after 430 years 'on this very day', we know that there was an entrance into
Egypt in 1943Nisan14, on the same very day 430 years earlier, by the armies of
Jehovah, which at that time was Abraham and Lot and their households. So
presumably Egypt was ruling south of the Euphrates at that time in what was to
become the promised land. Josephus, the Jewish Historian who was a contemporary
of Jesus, counts the Abrahamic covenant as starting with Abraham crossing the
Euphrates 430 years before the Exodus. But one can deduce this from the
following scriptures too: 17 The sun was now setting
and a dense darkness came and, look! A smoking furnace and a fiery torch that
passed in between these pieces. 2 And Joshua went on to
say to all the people: This is what Jehovah the God of Israel has said, It was
on the other side of the River that your forefathers dwelt a long time ago,
Terah the father of Abraham and the father of Nahor, and they used to serve
other gods. For
more on this - see [100].
1943Nisan14 was April 10th 1943 BC. Technical
note: One
can also deduce the date of the last year of Solomon by counting backward
through the kings of Israel and Judah either from Josiah, whose last year we
know was 608, which we deduce from the scriptures: 1 The word that occurred
to Jeremiah concerning all the people of Judah in the 4th year of Jehoiakim the
son of Josiah, the king of Judah, that is, the first year of Nebuchadnezzar the
king of Babylon; 8 years old was Josiah
when he began to reign, and for 31 years he reigned in Jerusalem (2 Kings 22:1). Or
we can count back through the kings to Solomon starting from the date of the
fall of Samaria to Shalmanezer, known by historians (Cambridge Ancient History)
to be in the year 723Nisan to 722Nisan. Melchizedek's
Bread And Wine
18 And Melchizedek, King
of Salem, brought out the bread and wine, and he was priest of the Most High
God. Abraham gave Melchizedek a 10th of all things because the 2AC gives a 10th of mankind to the King of the Kingdom of God, the King of Peace, Melchizedek. The Bread and Wine were for the 1AC, the PARC, because the 2AC was not promised until Genesis 18. Melchizedek is said to have blessed Abraham and God and really everything except the bread and wine. But since he brought them out and since he was the priest, he would have blessed them too. The two of them celebrated the 1AC with all those present. This would have been done on Nisan14, for as we shall see in U15 Jesus celebrated the 1AC at the last supper. Abraham could take these emblems even though Jesus had not died yet, since the apostles also ate this bread and drank this wine before he died at the last supper and in theory at least he might have failed the test. _____________________________ Writer's
Notes Incidentally
the 6 water jars into wine at Cana are those in the 2AC subcovenants of Isaac,
Moses, and the 4 Elijah's. PARC
and HARC are the righteous decree in the flesh; the ARC is the righteous decree
in the spirit (everlasting life). 23 Not only that, but we
ourselves also who have the firstfruits, namely, the spirit, yes, we
ourselves groan within ourselves, while we are earnestly waiting for adoption as
sons, the release from our bodies by ransom
[an angelic ransom actually of
the associated angel of John the baptist, the validation sacrifice of the JAC
for Jacob] (Romans 8). 13 For if the blood of
goats and of bulls and the ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who have been
defiled sanctifies to the extent of cleanness of the flesh
[being a
cleanliness resulting from the true religion is
a baptism into the 2AC], Jesus
died to give everlasting life to Adam, so his Master Covenant imparts
everlasting life and so entrance into it is the end of the test that a
sanctified Christian undergoes. 26 And to Seth also there
was born a son and he proceeded to call his name Enosh. At that time a start
was made of calling on the name of Jehovah (Genesis 4). So if Enosh is 'Abraham' then his son Kenan is 'Isaac' and his son
Mehalalel is 'Jacob'. This is a patriarchal society and these guys were all
alive so things have to work like this. Jared was Melchizedek to start with.
Noah, Shem and Arpachshad are the trio of the peri-flood system. Since Cainan
was Melchizedek, who comes after the trio. You can baptize someone in the blood
of a covenant before that blood arrives but you cannot give someone the blessing
of the covenant until the blood of the covenant arrives. Jared ransomed Adam's
Dad for the PARC. Because Adam senior was the real Abraham hence his 'seed'
became Adam. The Law was a subcovenant of the
2AC and the New Covenant, the 1NC, is a subcovenant of the JAC which is a
subcovenant of the 3AC, the AAC
22 For example, it is
written that Abraham acquired two sons, one by the servant girl and one by the
free woman, So Hagar symbolized the law covenant and Sarah was the mother of
the new covenant saints, i.e. the new covenant according to Paul. But neither
the Law nor the 1NC were Abraham's wives. Rather the main covenant of the Law,
the 2AC, and the promise for the main covenant (the JAC) of the new covenant,
the 3AC, were the wives of Abraham. Paul is referring to the marriage of the Law to Abraham through
the 2AC and the marriage of the New Covenant to Abraham through the JAC and
the 3AC, which was the promise for the JAC. It was possible to be declared righteous by God by means of the
law of Moses: 13 For the hearers of law
are not the ones righteous before God, but the doers of law will be declared
righteous (Romans 2). This
happened in the cases of Zechariah and Elizabeth, John the baptist's parents: 5 In the days of Herod,
king of Judea, there happened to be a certain priest named Zechariah of the
division of Abijah, and he had a wife from the daughters of Aaron, and her name
was Elizabeth. So since people under law were being declared righteous, they were
getting the blessing of Isaac for those in the true religion, since the true
religion was the law at the time, so the law was a subcovenant of the 2AC. The
blessing of Isaac is a resurrection into the Kingdom of God on earth as an
edenic human priest. It is the blessing of Gabriel, the blessing of Methuselah,
the blessing of the HARC. It is the same from a salvation standpoint as the
blessing of Abraham, the blessing of the 1AC, which is the blessing of
Melchizedek, the blessing of Jared, the blessing of the PARC. The righteous
decree in the spirit, the resurrection into the Kingdom of God in heaven, the
resurrection as an angel, is the blessing not of Abraham, but of Michael through
the ARC by way of his seed, Jacob (JAC) and of Jesus (1NC). The New covenant was a sub covenant of the 3AC which was a promise
leading to the JAC, the main covenant for being born again. For the full story
of Genesis 16 and Galatians 4 see [210]. But
really, how could the Jews have so many covenants and the Christians have only
one?? The Second New Covenant,
The Covenant of Keturah and of Rachel
Sections
to read first: 1 to 10 On the night before his death, Thursday night, March 31st 33 AD
(Gregorian), Nisan14 according to the BLC,
Jesus celebrated the passover meal with his 12 apostles. The passover meal was a
celebration, a festival of the Jews; it was not a commiseration or a funeral
service. It was inaugurated on the night of the last plague of Egypt, the 10th
plague (1513Nisan14 or 30th/31st March 1513 BC). This plague killed the
firstborn son in every household of the Egyptians, but passed over the household
of every Jew who celebrated it. After the Jews left Egypt, God made a covenant
with them called the Law Covenant, or the Law of Moses. Moses was the mediator
of this covenant. His mediation was that God made a covenant with Moses and then
Moses made a covenant with the sons of Israel: 27 And Jehovah went on to
say to Moses: Write down for yourself these words, because it is in accordance
with these words that I do conclude a covenant with you and Israel (Exodus 34). 1 These are the words of
the covenant that Jehovah commanded Moses to conclude with the sons of Israel in
the land of Moab aside from the covenant that he had concluded with them in
Horeb (Deuteronomy 29). At the last supper Jesus made a new covenant with eleven of his
apostles (Judas left after the meal and before Jesus made the new covenant). His
mediation was that God made a covenant with him for a kingdom and he made a
covenant with the 11 for that kingdom:
29
And I make a covenant with you, just as my Father has made a covenant with me,
for a kingdom (Luke 22). But was the New covenant the last covenant to be made between God
and his people, Abraham's true seed, before Armageddon? In this section we
consider 5 ways of seeing that there were to be more subcovenants of the 2AC and
of the 3AC/JAC made after the law and the new covenants. These are: [1]
The wording of Jeremiah 31:31-33 [2]
The Symbolism of Keturah, Abraham's third wife [3]
The Symbolism of the wife of Lot. [4]
One race does not need three fathers [5]
The symbolism of Rachel, Jacob's 4th wife Jeremiah
31:31-33 The
new covenant itself takes its name from the prophecy of Jeremiah: 31 Look! There are days
coming, is the utterance of Jehovah, and I will conclude with the house of
Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant; In
an unprecedented re-iteration, this whole covenant recital is repeated by
Paul in Hebrews8:
6 But now he has obtained a more excellent public service, so that he is also
the mediator of a correspondingly better covenant, which has been legally
established upon better promises. Since Paul has recited the whole thing again Verbatim, with a few
explanatory notes, we should consider every word in this scripture very
carefully. The first thing to realize is that normally agreements are made on
one day, not on two days. How many times has the reader signed an agreement made
on the blank day of blank? You fill in the date of the agreement. One hardly
ever fills in two dates for an agreement. Only when a further clause is added at
a later date would there be two dates involved in an agreement. Now the new covenant itself was made on one day, namely 33Nisan14,
the day of the last supper. But God says: Days (plural) are coming when he will make a new covenant with
two houses. Since the new covenant was made only on one day, there must be a
further day of covenant making, and therefore a further covenant in addition to
the new covenant. But things do not stop there, because the new covenant was not
made with the literal houses of Judah and Israel. It was made with Gentiles too.
Therefore God is using the house of Judah and the house of Israel more generally
here. Now the New covenant saints are to be kings in the heavens and we know
that the Kingly line belongs to the tribe of Judah, and we know that Jerusalem
was in Judah. So the new covenant, begin royal, was made with the greater house
of Judah. So we have found a further new covenant that is made with a greater
house of Israel on a separate day to the new covenant. But neither do things stop here, because we then read that God
will make a covenant not with two houses, but with one house, the house of
Israel, and he will make it 'after those days'. After which days? Well certainly
not after the day (singular) of his taking hold of the hand of their forefathers
to bring them out of Egypt, since that day is singular. So he makes this
covenant with the house of Israel after the days upon which he makes the two
covenants with the greater houses of Judah and Israel of verse 8. So now we have
3 covenants, one with a greater house of Judah, and two with greater houses of
Israel. Pause
for thought These two further new covenants are so incredibly significant from
a theological standpoint, that we are going to deduce their existence all over
again [read it all again or rewind the video]. They mean for one thing that
there has been or will be more than one true Christian church. They mean that the Catholic assertion, that there is a true
religious line from Peter to today is wrong. The Catholics are indeed the true
descendants of the first Christian church, FDS1, which was a church of the first
new covenant, they do trace their ancestry to Peter, yes, but the church which
Peter was the first president of actually fell in 67Tishri - see [40], [41]. The
missing 4th new covenant For symmetry there is likely to be a 4th new covenant that is not
explicitly mentioned in the literal meaning of Hebrews 8. It is made with a
second house of Judah, and it relates to the second house of Israel (for one
cannot have an Israel without a Judah). It will be a royal covenant since it is
with a greater house of Judah. Now many religions (including the JWs) know that the New covenant
saints are to be Kings in heaven and that 'some other Christians will end up on
earth' in the Kingdom of God after Armageddon in a second Eden, in an earthly
paradise that lasts for 1,000 years. The JWs have ‘The Abrahamic Covenant’
as saving these ones. We know the true God does nothing without a covenant. For
Moses said of him: 4 The rock, perfect is his
activity, all his ways are justice (Deuteronomy 32). But we must not be naive about this sort of thing. If God has
heavenly kings over the kingdom of God then he will also have earthly kings. And
if his heavenly kings have a covenant then so will his earthly kings have a
covenant. Since this earthly covenant will be a royal covenant, it will be made
with a greater house of Judah. So really we have 4 new covenants, made with a
heavenly Judah, a heavenly Israel, an earthly Judah and an earthly Israel. Furthermore it is apparent from the administrative structure of
the physical nation of Israel that there was a King who had princely deputies
and administrators and subjects and that there was a high priest who had Aaronic
Priests under him who had levitical priests under him who had the people under
their care. We know that our Lord combined the two offices of King and Priest,
for the house of God is not divided and there is no real authority anywhere on
earth or in the heavens apart from Jehovah. So we would expect to find a
King/Priest a group of royal aaronic priestly administrators and a group or non
royal, levitical, priestly administrators and subjects in the Kingdom of God,
since God's works are fractal. But this Kingdom is split in two into an earthly
and a heavenly part, just a Jerusalem itself was split by the two mountains of
Zion and Moriah. For its very name means 'foundation of twofold peace'. So imposing the Pattern of God's physical people onto both the
heavenly and the earthly halves of the Kingdom of God we get a King, a Royal
priesthood covenant, a priesthood covenant and subjects upstairs, and the same
thing downstairs. The new covenant is the royal priesthood covenant for the
heavens. The two covenants with the greater houses of Israel are the two
covenants for the non royal priests of the heavens and of the earth. The missing
second covenant with the house of Judah is the covenant for a royal priesthood
on the earth in the Kingdom. Pictorially we have the following:
We
call these 4 covenants the 1NC, the 2NC, the 1NCH and the 2NCH. The
Helper/Priestly covenants are made with Israel and the royal covenants are made
with Judah. The Word Symbolic Meaning
of Hebrews 8 The literal meaning has given us 3 new covenants and has hinted at
a 4th. In the Word symbolic meaning of Hebrews 8, the new covenant is the 2NC,
which is actually made with two houses on two days. It was made with Gordon for
the house of Judah, the 144,000 earthly kings on 1992Elul16, we call this the
2NC (k), for 2NC Kings, and it was made with Gordon for the house of Israel, the
earthly priests (further 2NCH saints like the sons of Bilhah) in 1995Elul
(Genesis 25, 16 sons from Keturah as wife, and 1 Chronicles 1, 13 sons from
Keturah as concubine), we call this the 2NC (a), for 2NC administrators. We have
in the past incorrectly called the 2NC (a) the Great Crowd Covenant, the GCC.
The covenant made after those days, with the house of Israel is actually the
2BRC, the second born rapture covenant, the covenant of Lot's second daughter of
Genesis 18 - U154.
Incidentally those saved by the 2BRC include the Zoar Class, which is everyone
in the 1AC but not the 2AC or 3AC who survives Armageddon. The 1BRC and the 2BRC
(the two daughters of Lot) offer salvation through an angelic soul and are
therefore subcovenants of the ARC. Manasseh is the 2NC (k) saints in the
Watchtower; Ephraim is the 2NC (a) saints from the world and Benjamin is the
Great Crowd. The Great Crowd is everyone who is raptured by the two rapture
covenants. Jesus is the mediator of a correspondingly better covenant than
the law in the literal meaning (the 1NC), and Gordon is the mediator of a
correspondingly better covenant that the law in the word symbolic meaning (the
2NC). Keturah, Abraham's 3rd wife St. Paul describes the first two wives of Abraham, Hagar, and
Sarah, as standing symbolically for the Law Covenant and the New Covenant. He is
literally telling us that Genesis 16, the account of these wives, is written in
a symbolic code - see [Bible
Code] (although in Genesis 16, Sarah is the 2AC and the 3AC in the
two word symbolic meanings - see [210]).
However, we do not need to employ the bible code to deduce the existence of a
further covenant after the New covenant; we just have to follow the symbolism
explained by St. Paul and apply it not to Genesis 16 but rather to Genesis 25. 1 Furthermore, Abraham
again took a wife, and her name was Keturah (Genesis 25). Keturah was initially a slave of Abraham, but she finally became
his wife (Hagar was given as Abraham's wife, but is not said to have become his
wife; rather she is still referred to as the maidservant of Sarah). Now one
might think that God is condoning procreative sex outside marriage here. But one
forgets that Abraham owned Sarah as his wife, and Sarah owned Hagar as her
maidservant, so Abraham owned Hagar as his wife's maidservant. So Abraham had
obligations to look after Hagar and their children, through the
agreement/mechanism of slavery or servanthood. So his actions with Hagar were
not irresponsible or sinful. So Abraham's 3rd wife Keturah must stand for a further covenant in
addition to the Law (Hagar) and the New Covenant (Sarah) if we follow the
symbolic interpretation of Paul. Now since we know that there are no new
covenants before the Law of Moses or before the new covenant itself, this
further covenant must come after the new covenant. So we call it the second new
covenant. In fact nowhere in the scriptures, neither in Jeremiah, in Hebrews or
in Luke, is what churches call the new covenant ever referred to as the
new covenant. It is always referred to as a new covenant. It is only the
cup of the new covenant itself that Jesus calls 'The new covenant'. 20 Also, the cup in the
same way after they had the evening meal, he saying: This cup means the new
covenant by virtue of my blood, which is to be poured out in your behalf
(Luke 22). 31 Look! There are days
coming, is the utterance of Jehovah, and I will conclude with the house of
Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant (Jeremiah 31). If 'the' new covenant is merely 'a' new covenant, then there is at
least one further new covenant. It is as simple as that. We can find out a bit
about the covenant of Keturah from the next verses of Genesis 25: 2 And she bore to him
(Corrected - NWT) Zimran and Jokshan and Medan and Midian and Ishbak and Shuah. That’s 16 sons, although Asshurim and Letushim and Leummim could
be generic plural names for the sons of Asshur, Letush and Leum. However Dedan
himself obviously only had the 3 sons. Actually Hebrew men did have plural names
on occasion, for example Kittim, Dodanim, Mizraim and Mizraim's 7 sons: Ludim,
Anamim, Lehabim, Naphtuhim, Pathrusim, Casluhim and Caphtorim (Genesis 10). Also
Muppim and Huppim were sons of Benjamin and Hushim was a son of Dan (Genesis
46). However these 3 names: Asshurim and Letushim and Leummim leave us
with an ambiguity. But the holy spirit uses ambiguities to say something, for it
is very aware of its own ambiguities, they are not mistakes, they are not
oversights, they are designed ambiguities. Consider the other appearance of
Keturah in the bible: 32 As for the sons of
Keturah, Abraham's concubine, she gave birth to: The sons of Dedan with the plural names are missing!! Here we only
have 13 sons of Keturah as a concubine but we have 16 sons of hers as a wife! So
basically Abraham married Keturah after giving him the 13 sons mentioned above
and then had 3 more sons, these being Asshurim, Letushim and Leummim. But this
further procreative arrangement of Keturah being Abraham's concubine stands for
a further covenant which since she is not a wife but a slave has a dependency on
one of the other covenants. In other words it is a slave covenant of one of
the other covenants which was made after Sarah, the new covenant, and before
Keturah was actually married. But since the same woman Keturah was both a slave
and a wife, this slave covenant must be slaving for the covenant symbolized by
Keturah as a wife, i.e. the second new covenant. So we have found a second new
covenant with a further slave covenant made in advance of it, but after the
first new covenant. What is
this covenant of Keturah and who is it between?
The
Hebrew word for Keturah is hrw+q
and
is from the root r+q
which
means either:
ii.
Knots, difficult questions (Ben Davidson Hebrew and
Chaldee Lexicon) God
used to enjoy the smoke rising from sacrifices made to him:
20
And Noah began to build an altar to Jehovah and to take some of all the clean
beasts and of all the clean flying creatures and to offer burnt offerings upon
the altar.
21
And Jehovah began to smell a restful odor, and so Jehovah said in his heart:
Never again shall I call down evil upon the ground on man's account, because the
inclination of the heart of man is bad from his youth up; and never again shall
I deal every living thing a blow just as I have done (Genesis 8:20,21). But sacrifices ended with Jesus' sacrifice before the covenant of
Keturah was made. So the meaning for the covenant which she symbolizes must be
the difficult questions and knots. This meaning does not relate to the more
difficult questions in trivia game shows, it is the difficult questions and
knots in the bible, many of which are tackled in this website/book. Today
Jehovah gets pleasure from our consideration of the difficult questions and
knots in his holy book. Holy posers is what he has given us. This is a restful
thing for our God, however, superficial, lobotomized devotion to a meeting time
or a meeting place or a doctrine or a religious leader, on the other hand, is
not a restful thing to him. 5 Later on Abraham gave
everything he had to Isaac, but to the sons of the concubines that Abraham had
Abraham gave gifts. Abraham gave the sons of Keturah gifts, and he sent them away from
Isaac his son (by Sarah) eastward, to the land of the east! Whilst he was still
alive. So before the Abrahamic covenant ends we know that the sons of Sarah and
the sons of Keturah will be split up. The sons of Keturah who go eastwards to
the land of the east are going to Eden, the new Eden, the Kingdom of God on
earth. So these sons are the last congregation of true Christians who carry on
to the end and gain entry to the Kingdom of God, the second Eden. The gifts are the modern day gifts of the spirit, which are
basically the likes of the things in this work, which are deduced by untying
knots, as the Queen of Babylon recognized in the case of Daniel the prophet: 12 Forasmuch as an
extraordinary spirit and knowledge and insight to interpret dreams and the
explanation of riddles and the untying of knots had been found in him, in
Daniel, whom the king himself named Belteshazzar. Now let Daniel himself be
called, that he may show the very interpretation (Daniel 5). For
there was a prophet who said: 28 And after that it must
occur that I shall pour out my spirit on every sort of flesh, and your sons and
your daughters will certainly prophesy. As for your old men, dreams they will
dream. As for your young men, visions they will see (Joel 2). And
Peter at Pentecost in 33 AD explained that the 'tongues as if of fire' (Acts
2:3), which plainly relate to a decoded biblical knowledge of the details
Armageddon... 3 And tongues as if of
fire became visible to them and were distributed about, and one sat upon each
one of them, was
a fulfillment of the words of Joel above which he quoted as follows: 17 And in the
last days,
God says: I shall pour out some of my spirit upon every sort of flesh, and your
sons and your daughters will prophesy and your young men will see visions and
your old men will dream dreams; But having quoted it himself he makes it the holy word again. And
so there is to be a further fulfillment to Acts 2:17, 18 in the last days not of
the physical Jewish system of things but of the World itself. And here it is!!
Here they are the gifts from God. And as a result of these gifts the following
situation will pertain: 12 And they will by no
means teach each one his fellow citizen and each one his brother, saying: Know
Jehovah! For they will all know me, from [the] least one to [the] greatest one
of them. Now if there is a newer covenant then there is a newer messenger
of that covenant and a newer mediator of that covenant. In the case of the Law
covenant, the Messenger was Moses, who came down from the mountain with the
tablets, and the Mediator was Moses, for God said: 27 Write to you namely the
words, the these, because upon account of the words, the these, I made with you
covenant, and with Israel (Exodus 34 NIVHEOT). 1 These are the words of
the covenant that Jehovah commanded Moses to conclude with the sons of
Israel in the land of Moab aside from the covenant that he had concluded with
them in Horeb (Deuteronomy 29). For the newer mediator is the covenanter (indirectly) with God
actually through Michael and Abraham. Through Abraham because all the families
of the earth will bless themselves through him, and any blessings follow from
covenants with God. And through Michael because God saying: and I shall by no
means call their sins to mind anymore, means that those in the covenant have the
gift of a clean conscience, which means that they are in the ARC. Paul said: 5 For there is one God,
and one mediator between God and men, a man, Christ Jesus (1 Timothy 2). This statement does not preclude Moses from being a mediator. It
precludes Moses from mediating directly between God and men at the time 1
Timothy was written. Jesus is the master mediator of the ARC. Abraham and Moses
were master covenanters or sub mediators of various master covenants. 19 Why, then, the Law? It
was added to make transgressions manifest, until the seed should arrive to whom
the promise had been made; and it was transmitted through angels by the hand of
a mediator (Galatians 3). 6 But now [Jesus] has
obtained a more excellent public service, so that he is also the mediator of a
correspondingly better covenant, which has been legally established upon better
promises (Hebrews 8). If Jesus was
also the mediator of a (correspondingly
better) covenant, then Moses too was a mediator. So Behold how great this man
Jesus is, for he is not only a prince of princes and a Lord of Lords and a King
of Kings, but also a mediator of mediators! Likewise in the case of the New covenant the messenger was Jesus,
and the Mediator was Jesus for he himself said: 29 And I make a covenant
with you just as my father has made a covenant with me, for a kingdom (Luke 22). And
Paul said: 6 But now [Jesus] has
obtained a more excellent public service, so that he is also the mediator of a
correspondingly better covenant, which has been legally established upon better
promises. Again
not 'the' second covenant, but 'a' second covenant. 15 So that is why he is a
mediator of a new covenant, in order that, because a death has occurred for
[their] release by ransom from the transgressions under the former covenant, the
ones who have been called might receive the promise of the everlasting
inheritance (Hebrews 9:15). Again
not 'the new covenant', but 'a new covenant' - see [13]. And Malachi cries out at the end of the old testament: 1 Look! I am sending my
messenger, and he must clear up a way before me. And suddenly there will come to
his temple the [true] Lord, whom you people are seeking, and the messenger of
the covenant in whom you are delighting. Look! He will certainly come, Jehovah
of armies has said (Malachi 3:1). The literal fulfillment of this was Jesus Christ. The messenger
and mediator of the new covenant. So likewise with the Second new covenant, the
messenger will be the mediator. You have just been given the Message. Technical
Note on cups and covenants: Gordon first informed the Watchtower about the second new covenant
on 1993Adar17, in a letter to them about the forthcoming memorial which he
wanted to partake of in a different way (He was mistaken about partaking in that
memorial). James and John, the sons of Zebedee prefigure two new mediators of
two further new covenants: 23 He said to them: You
will indeed drink my cup, but this sitting down at my right hand and my left is
not mine to give, but it belongs to those for whom it has been prepared by my
father. 38 But Jesus said to them:
You do not know what you are asking for. Are you able to drink the cup which I
am drinking, or to be baptized with the baptism with which I am being baptized? The '10 others' are the ten watches of spiritual Israel in FDS1
and FDS3 - see [34],
[35], [36]. James is Paul and John is Gordon here. And both Paul and
Gordon drink a cup which represents a new covenant between God and each of them
through Jesus and Abraham, for they are brothers in Jacob, sons of the JAC. For
Jesus accepted a cup: 17 And accepting the cup,
he gave thanks and said: Take this and pass it from one to another among
yourselves (Luke 22). 20 This cup means the new
covenant by virtue of my blood (Luke 22). Jesus’
cup was not merely to drink his own blood but rather to pour it out to his
father for the sake of all of us, and for the sake of Adam in particular. Hence
he prayed in Gethsemane: 36 And he went on to say:
Abba, Father, all things are possible to you; remove this cup from me. Yet not
what I want, but what you want (Mark 14). This cup that Jesus asked to be removed from him was the cup of
the ARC through which covenant Jesus would die as an angel and go to Tartarus
initially. And he did not want to drink it (who would), but he did it. He did it
for God and for Adam and for Adam’s sons. This was the greatness of his
sacrifice! Total selflessness. Now since the cup of Jesus was a covenant, the
ARC, and since both James and John also drink the cup which Jesus drinks, they
are symbolically standing for two other new covenants, which are subcovenants of
the ARC. These are the 2NC and the 2NCH. Remember
the wife of Lot Before
Jesus died he left us with the haunting words: 'Remember the wife of Lot. The
context of his words was: 29 But on the day that Lot
came out of Sodom it rained fire and sulphur from heaven and destroyed them all. Jesus is telling us here that the day of the destruction of Sodom
by fire is an archetype for the day when the son of man is revealed. But quite
obviously the day of the destruction of Sodom by fire from heaven symbolically
represents the day of the fiery destruction of Armageddon. From this we can
deduce that the son of man (Jesus) is revealed during the 'day' of Armageddon. 19 For the eager
expectation of the creation is waiting for the revealing of the sons of God
(Romans 8). What is this 'son of man' the reader might ask? Well, a son in
biblical times was a means of continuing your seed. Now Adam, having been
sentenced to death, was no longer able to continue seed who were sons of God,
like he was. But Jesus, having ransomed him, was now able to procreate in the
way that Adam had lost the capability of doing. So Jesus can now provide
judicially living children for Adam, and therefore is his 'procreative son'. But
Adam means 'man' in Hebrew. So Jesus, the procreative son of Adam is the
procreative son of 'man' i.e. the son of man. Jesus was the son of 'Adam before
he sinned' in this sense. We covered this in section [7]
on the ransom. Jesus having ransomed Adam earns the Fatherhood rights that Adam
would have had, had he not sinned. We have seen above from Paul's inspired interpretation of the
symbolic meanings of Hagar and Sarah, Abraham's wives, in Galatians 4, that
wives can stand for covenants in the scriptures. So Lot's wife could stand for a
covenant too, following the inspired leading of Paul, although we are
effectively using the Symbolic
Structure Principle of the bible code here. In the account of the
destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis 19, God sent two angels to Sodom
and they saved Lot and his two daughters and his wife leading them out of Sodom
by their hands. God told Lot and his family:
17 And it came about that,
as soon as they had brought them forth to the outskirts, he began to say: Escape
for your soul! Do not look behind you and do not stand still in all the
District! Escape to the mountainous region for fear you may be swept away! (Genesis
19)
26
And his wife began to look around from behind him, and she became a pillar of
salt (Genesis 19). Lot, his wife, his two daughters, the two angels and the
inhabitants of Zoar and the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah stand for angels
and people and groups of people at Armageddon - U154.
Briefly: Lot
is the administration of FDS4 19 All the holy
contributions, which the sons of Israel will contribute to Jehovah, I have given
to you and your sons and your daughters with you, as an allowance to time
indefinite. It is a covenant of salt to time indefinite before Jehovah for you
and your offspring with you (Numbers 18:19). 5 Is it not for you to know that
Jehovah the God of Israel himself gave a kingdom to David over Israel to time
indefinite, to him and to his sons, by a covenant of salt? (2 Chronicles 13:5). So there are two covenants of salt one to Moses and one to David.
Lot's wife is some kind of a greater covenant of salt because the offices of
king and priest were combined at Jesus' death. For he has become our high priest
and our king. One race does not need 3 fathers! It is a simple observation. The physical sons of Israel had three
fathers, namely, Jacob (whose name was changed to Israel), Isaac, and Abraham.
This is quite obviously symbolizing 3 races of people, in the greater meaning.
So there are 3 main categories of Abraham's greater seed. These are the sons of
the 1AC, the sons of the PARC, the sons of Abraham, and the sons of the 2AC, the
sons of Isaac, the sons of the HARC, and the sons of the 3AC, the sons of Jacob,
the sons of the ARC. So there are three types of God's people, those with faith,
those with a water baptism and those with a spirit baptism. The 4 wives of Jacob We have discovered from Jesus' words, that John and James were
mediators of two further new covenants, drinking the same 'cup' that Jesus
'drank'. In fact it is not hard to see that the two robbers impaled or crucified
either side of Jesus, two men who certainly died the same death as him, also
prefigures the two further mediators of two further new covenants. We also know
that Keturah was both a slave and then a wife, so she represents two new
covenants. So as things stand we have 3 new covenants in all.
We do not know how you, the reader, feel about these two extras at
Jesus' death. What were they doing there? This is the singular most important
event in the whole of the history of man, since Adam's sin, and we have two
co-stars being nominated in the category of best supporting crucifixion. Why on
earth would God countenance such a thing? What was the relationship between
these 3 deaths? Well it is described above in one meaning... We know that Keturah was a slave before she became a wife, and she
had kids for Abraham after Sarah did. So the order of these 3 covenants is as
above. But is there any advance on 3? This is where the big picture begins. Can
you think of a descendant of Abraham who had at least three wives?? The answer is Jacob; he had four, two free and two slaves. So far
we have 3, two free and one slave, so there is one more slave covenant, a slave
covenant to the new (heavenly) covenant. Genesis 30 tells us that the order of procreation from Jacob, who
stands for Jesus here, was as follows:
Here, Hagar and Sarah without Keturah symbolize the Law and the
New covenant. But with Keturah, Hagar symbolizes another slave covenant, for she
was Sarah’s slave. Now you can see a very, very, important thing. There is a gap in
the procreation of Leah. This is a gap in the new covenant saints. In fact this
gap was 1800 years long, or '5 times' of no new covenant saint baptism, see - [The
Times Principle], [Intermission
Times]. This is more or less the gap between the two presences of the
Christ. He is present in body through his bride who is the new covenant saints
as a group. But when there are no new covenant saints around, he is absent. You
can also see 5 true Christian peoples (as regards spirit baptism), although we
only have 4 true Christian religions as we understand it (from 4 Elijah's with 4
baptisms into the 2AC). In fact Bilhah and Zilpah were in the same religion,
FDS2 - see [34]. John and James prefigure the mediators of Bilhah and
Rachel, who were Paul and Gordon. We do not know who mediated Zilpah at this
point. Technical note: The more inquisitive reader might be asking: "Fine so what do
all their sons symbolize?" The answer is: Calls to be baptized into the
various covenants. Reuben was the call to the men of Judah to be baptized into
the new covenant; Peter was the first of these, baptized after Jesus came down
from the 40 days in the wilderness. Simeon was the call to the proselytes to be
baptized into the new covenant, which was made at Pentecost 33 CE (Acts 2:5-10).
Levi was the Samaritan call (Acts 8) and Judah was the Gentile call (Acts 10).
These 12 sons are the 12 pearl gates of heavenly Jerusalem, which are 12 calls
to be baptized into 4 covenants. 21 Also, the 12 gates were
12 pearls; each one of the gates was made of one pearl. And the broad way of the
city was pure gold, as transparent glass (Revelation 21). The validation sacrifice for the second new covenant John the
baptist, it is a covenant for half a kingdom, the earthly half, as Herod Antipas
said to Herodias' daughter. Now that we have grasped the fundamentals of God’s Covenants, we
must address what we must do to become part of these covenants and if we
don’t, what effect it may have on our salvation. | Now you can easily search the Lords' Witnesses website!
A Personal Letter to all of my Friends and Family
For those who wish to help us spread the "Good News"
|
