|
The Lords' Witnesses The Lord said: " Keep on asking, and it will be given you; keep on seeking, and you will find; keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you." (Matthew 7:7)
euei
|
|
|
|
The Second New CovenantOn the night before his death, Thursday night, March 31st 33 AD (Gregorian), Nisan14 according to the BLC, Jesus celebrated the passover meal with his 12 apostles. The passover meal was a celebration, a festival of the Jews, it was not a commiseration or a funeral service. It was inaugurated on the night of the last plague of Egypt, the 10th plague (1513Nisan14 or 30th/31st March 1513 BC). This plague killed the firstborn son in every household of the Egyptians, but passed over the household of every Jew who celebrated it. After the Jews left Egypt, God made a covenant with them called the Law Covenant, or the Law of Moses. Moses was the mediator of this covenant. His mediation was that God made a covenant with Moses and then Moses made a covenant with the sons of Israel: 27 And Jehovah went on to say to Moses: Write down for yourself these words, because it is in accordance with these words that I do conclude a covenant with you and Israel (Exodus 34). 1 These are the words of the covenant that Jehovah commanded Moses to conclude with the sons of Israel in the land of Moab aside from the covenant that he had concluded with them in Horeb (Deuteronomy 29). At the last supper Jesus made a new covenant with eleven of his apostles (Judas left after the meal and before Jesus made the new covenant). His mediation was that God made a covenant with him for a kingdom and he made a covenant with the 11 for that kingdom: 30 Therefore, after he received the morsel, he went out immediately. And it was night (John 13). 29 And I make a
covenant with you, just as my Father has made a covenant with me, for a kingdom
(Luke 22). But was the New covenant the last covenant to be made between God and his people, Abraham's true seed, before Armageddon? In this section we consider 7 ways of seeing that there were to be more subcovenants of the CRC/2BC/2AC/ICC and of the ARC/3BC/3AC/JAC made after the law and the new covenants. These are: [1] The wording of Jeremiah 31:31-33 and Hebrews 8 [2] The Symbolism of Keturah, Abraham's third wife [3] The symbolism of Leah, Rachel, Bilhah and Zilpah Jacob's 4 wives [4] The New Covenant is never called such in scripture, it is always referred to as 'A New Covenant'. [5] Plural Keys of the Kingdom mean plural temples in the Kingdom [6] The 4 calls into the Second New Covenant [7] The children of Jerusalem above are more numerous than those of Jerusalem below [1] Jeremiah 31:31-33 and Hebrews 8The (first) new covenant itself takes its name from the prophecy of Jeremiah: 31 Look! There
are days coming, is the utterance of Jehovah, and I will conclude with the house
of Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant; In an unprecedented re-iteration, this whole covenant recital is repeated by Paul in Hebrews8: [6 But now
he has obtained a more excellent public service, so that he is also the mediator
of a correspondingly better covenant, which has been legally established upon
better promises. 8 For he does
find fault with the people when he says: Look! There are days coming,
says Jehovah, and I will conclude with the house of Israel and with the house of
Judah a new covenant, These are the two accounts of God's words promising a new covenant. The literal meaning of both accounts is the famous new covenant. This is said to be concluded with 2 houses on two days, since there are 'days' coming, not just one day coming. But how is this house of Judah and how is this house of Israel to be defined? God made the Law of Moses with Moses and Moses made it with all the 12 tribes of Israel, with every son of Jacob who was still associated with his race. But then in the days of Jeroboam and of Rehoboam, the sons of Solomon, the son of King David, the nation of Israel was split into two kingdoms, the southern Kingdom of Judah and the northern Kingdom of Israel. The reader at this point might well be asking but wait a minute, how can Israel + Judah = Israel? What can we say? The Hebrews were used to one word having two meanings. Whereas modern English tries to remove such ambiguities and when they occur we make jokes out of them! The Kingdom of Judah initially consisted of the two tribes of Judah and Benjamin, whereas the Kingdom of Israel consisted of the 10 remaining tribes. From the start of its existence, the Kingdom of Israel, for political reasons, set up its own form of Judaism. This northern Kingdom worshipped in Samaria, whereas the southern kingdom worshipped in Jerusalem. But at the time that God spoke to Jeremiah about the New Covenant, the Northern Kingdom had been destroyed by the Assyrians, and the Southern Kingdom was near to being destroyed by the Babylonians. So the house of Israel, having ceased to be a kingdom, then became a religious grouping of all those who worshipped in accordance with the Samarian version of the law. Likewise the house of Judah became the religious grouping of all those who worshipped according to the Jerusalem version of the law. The Samaritan Pentateuch, which was the 'holy book' of the house of Israel, still exists today, it is a non inspired translation into Aramaic of the Law of Moses. At the time that Jesus arrived, neither of the two kingdoms existed any longer, both were run by the Romans through various governors. So the house of Judah became those who worshipped at the temple in Jerusalem and the house of Israel became those who worshipped at the temple in Samaria. Loosely speaking the house of Judah were the 'Jews; and the house of Israel were the 'Samaritans'. Hence this conversation between Jesus and the Samaritan woman... 9 Therefore the Samaritan woman said to him: How is it that you, despite being a Jew, ask me for a drink, when I am a Samaritan woman? For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans. (John 4). So the new covenant was to be made both with the Jews and with the Samaritans. Both of these groups were circumcised, being sons of Abraham. Now all of the apostles were Jews, since they celebrated the last supper in Jerusalem and not in Samaria. So none were Samaritans by house of worship. In fact all of the 120 disciples in the upper room at Pentecost were Galileans by geography... 7 Indeed, they were astonished and began to wonder and say: See here, all these who are speaking are Galileans (Acts 2) This group included all the 11 apostles and all Jesus' brothers... 13 So, when they had entered, they went up into the
upper chamber, where they were staying, Peter as well as John and James and
Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James [the son] of Alphaeus
and Simon the zealous one, and Judas [the son] of James. So Jesus made the New Covenant only with the house of worship of Judah on 33Nisan14. So he made it with the Samaritans at a later time, on another day. We shall discover that actually there were 4 groups of people called into the New Covenant. Firstly the genetic Jews of the house of worship of Judah were called. Secondly the proselytes of the house of worship of Judah (those who were not sons of Jacob but nevertheless got circumcised and put themselves under the Law of Moses and worshipped in Jerusalem). Thirdly the house of worship of Israel, the Samaritans, and finally the Gentiles. These 4 groups are prefigured by the first 4 sons of Leah, Reuben, Simeon, Levi and Judah (Leah symbolises the New Covenant and Jacob was the mediator of the JAC, the superior covenant to the New Covenant) - see I29. Peter, was the first man to be baptised into the New Covenant by the angels on 29Heshvan22, on the second day after Jesus returned from the wilderness (John 1). He was in the wilderness from his baptism on 29Tishri10 (U41), for 40 days until 29Heshvan20. The account describing his baptism is this... 35
Again the next day [actually
29Heshvan22, 42 days after 29Tishri10 when Jesus was baptised]
John was standing with 2 of his disciples, The account does not say: And Peter was baptized in Holy Spirit. But as we discovered in section I32, one's name is changed when one is so baptized. God cannot change your name until you become his son. Abraham who was Abram, Israel who was Jacob, Isaac who was named before he was conceived etc were all spirit sons of God (although Isaac was non adamic). Being baptized into the name of the holy spirit is becoming God's son. Peter was baptized in holy spirit into the (first) new covenant, into the name of Jesus, the mediator of that covenant. So Jesus became his father by covenant at the time, so he had the right to rename Peter. When you are born again you are also named again. Peter means 'stone', and Simon was the first stone to be laid in the temple of all the 1NC saints. He was the first to be baptized of all of the sons of Israel in the house of Judah, who were called into the 1NC on that day. So this first group was called into the 1NC on 29Heshvan22. Peter actually joined up on that day, just as the Proselytes of Acts 2, the Samaritans of Acts 8 and Cornelius of Acts 10 did on the days of their respective callings into the 1NC. We cover these calls in more detail below. Peter was chosen by Jesus to be the first head of the first true Christian religion. So it was Peter's decision whether or not to let in the next group of 1NC saints. In fact it was his decision whether on not to let in the next 3 groups of 1NC saints. Some churches identify the calling of these 3 groups with '3' Keys of the Kingdom that they say Peter was given... 18 Also, I say to you, You are Peter, and on this
rock-mass I will build my congregation [with
you as the first stone placed on me the rock-mass], and the gates of
Hades will not overpower it. But this idea (which the LWs used to adhere to) is incorrect. The scriptures plainly show that the temple of the Jews had one door and one key... 27 And all around the house of the [true] God they
would spend the night; for guard service was upon them, and they were in charge
of the key, even [to open up] from morning to morning (1 Chronicles 9). So the concept that Peter had 3 keys to one door is a non starter. Instead Peter is rather like the Boarding Steward at an airport. She first calls everyone is rows 1 - 18, then rows 19 - 36 then rows 37 - 54 etc etc. She makes multiple calls for passengers to enter through one door into one airplane. This is the parable of the Stewardess if you like. So likewise Peter calls different groups of people at different times into the same temple through the same door opened with the same key. So since he has the 'keys' plural of the Kingdom, it is apparent that there is more than one temple in the Kingdom. For more on this see the section below on plural keys meaning plural temples in the Kingdom. Now the method of entry into every true Christian church is water baptism into a subcovenant of the ICC - see I29, I32. So Peter, being the head of the church, had the authority to make new boarding calls, to permit new groups to enter the first true church by water baptism into the 1EC, the first Christian subcovenant of the ICC. Furthermore the Law of the true church, the things bound on earth by Peter, were also the things bound in the heavens, because 1NC saints had to obey the law of the church in order to keep their water baptisms, and one cannot keep one's spirit baptism indefinitely in the absence of a water baptism, because the spirit baptized are sons of Jacob by covenant and the water baptized are sons of Isaac by covenant and just as one could not be a genetic son of Jacob without being a genetic son of Isaac, his father, so one cannot be a covenant son of Jacob, a son of the JAC, a spirit baptized Christian, without being a covenant son of Isaac, a son of the ICC, a water baptized Christian. No son of the JAC, could be saved if he died whilst not being a son of the ICC. So all of the 1NC saints had to obey the rules of the true church in order to be saved. They could of course break them and get thrown out and then be repentant and come back in before they died! So Peter and his brothers in the worship house of Judah, were called on 29Heshvan22 (see John 1:35 above), probably at the 12th hour. Then on 33Sivan6 at the 3rd hour (see Acts 2:1 below), the next group of people were called into the 1NC, these were the proselytes in the house of worship of Judah, i.e. those who were not genetic descendants of Jacob, but had been circumcised and did worship as Jews in Jerusalem. The scripture describing their call is this... 1
Now while the day of the [festival of] Pentecost
[33Sivan6 - 50 days after 33Nisan16]
was in progress they were all together at the same place, 36
Therefore let all the house of Israel know for a certainty that God made
him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you impaled. Only those who are born again, and therefore have an angelic existence, can exhibit the gifts of the spirit - see I22. The Galileans, who were speaking in tongues, were all part of the first call into the 1NC, for genetic sons of Jacob who were in the house of Judah, i.e. worshipping at Jerusalem. But both Jews and proselytes listened to Peter (see verse 10), who addressed 'all the house of Israel' (verse 36) by which is meant everyone under the Law of Moses (Jew and Proselyte). The 'house of Israel' is everyone worshipping in Samaria, but all the house of Israel, is everyone worshipping both at Jerusalem and Samaria, i.e. everyone under law. Israel can mean Israel + Judah or it can mean Israel - Judah. Now the 3,000 people added (verse 41), some of whom were proselytes were baptized in water in symbol of their repentance, but Peter promised them that they would receive the free gift of the holy spirit. So they were also born again, for those who are not so born cannot receive such gifts as we saw in I22. Therefore we see that the proselytes were first baptized into the 1NC at Pentecost. And Peter accepted the proselytes into the first true Christian church through water baptism on 33Sivan6. But now the interesting common factor appears. Peter was baptized around the 12th hour, and the proselytes were called at the 3rd hour. The Gentiles were called at the 9th hour, and the Samaritans although not explicitly stated to be called at the 6th hour, were in fact called in that very hour, for we read in the account of the Samaritan woman by the well of water that... 6 In fact, Jacob's fountain was there. Now Jesus, tired out from the journey, was sitting at the fountain just as he was. The hour was about the 6th (John 4). 14 Whoever drinks from the water that I will give him
will never get thirsty at all, but the water that I will give him will become in
him a fountain of water bubbling up to impart everlasting life. This is a cryptic reference to a water baptism for Samaritans that starts at the 6th hour. 14 When the apostles in Jerusalem
heard that Samaria had accepted the word of God, they dispatched Peter
and John to them; And then when Peter got the dream which prepared him for the calling of the Gentiles, it was the 6th hour... 9 The next day as they were pursuing their journey and
were approaching the city, Peter went up to the housetop about the 6th hour
to pray [the hour of the Samaritan call]. 30 Accordingly Cornelius said: Four days ago counting from this hour I was praying in my house at the 9th hour [the hour of the Gentile call], when, look! a man in bright raiment stood before me (Acts 10). The dream about eating unclean food, or accepting unclean materials into his own body is a symbolic representation of Peter accepting the hitherto unclean Gentiles into the body of the church. The Samaritan call, which is described in Acts 8, is represented by the time when he got the dream, the 6th hour. Whereas the Gentile call, when the Gentiles received the gifts of the spirit and then were water baptized by Peter, which is described in Acts 10:44-47, occurred at the 9th hour, the hour when the man in bright raiment stood before Peter. 44 While Peter was yet speaking about
these matters the holy spirit fell upon all those hearing the word. The third call into the 1NC of the Samaritans at the 6th hour was accepted by Peter in Acts 8. The 4th call into the 1NC of the Gentiles at the 9th hour was accepted by Peter in Acts 10. In the new testament, specific hours are only mentioned in the context of Jesus' death, or a call into the new covenant, or the parable of the workers called into the Vineyard at the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 11th hours (Matthew 20 - see U192). For mathematical symmetry, it looks like the 12th hour when the first call into the new covenant was made. Here is a chart of all 4 calls into the (first) new covenant... The 4 calls into the First New Covenant
For the derivations of 34Shebat and 36Tishri - see U192 and U42. The 3rd, 6th, 9th and '12th' hour calls are the 4 calls into the new covenant. The 11th hour call of the parable of Matthew 20, is not into the 1NC but into the EHC. The holy spirit by relating calls to hours, is saying that there are 12 calls into various spirit baptism covenants for Christians. Also the Samaritan call in 34Shebat is 20 months after the Proselyte call and 20 months before the Gentile call. So timing of the hours of the calls represents the timing of the calls themselves at 20 months to 3 hours! Now Jesus himself, whilst on earth, made the new covenant with the 11 apostles (Judas having left to betray him) during the last supper on Thursday night 33Nisan14 (33March31). This then was God making a new covenant with the house of worship of Judah, through Jesus. The Samaritan call in 34Shebat was when the house of worship of Israel gained admittance to the new covenant. So this call was God making a new covenant with the house of Israel. God also made the new covenant with two other groups as well, the proselytes and Gentiles, these being the other two calls, which resulted in Peter permitting water baptism of these two further called groups into the first true church. All of the above is just the fine detail of the new covenant, a covenant which in coarse detail is known to all Christian churches. But now, we are going to use our biblical literary microscope to find another covenant prophesied in the same set of words that informed us about the first new covenant... 8 for he does find fault with the
people when he says: Look! There are days coming,' says Jehovah, 'and I will
conclude with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant. The covenant of verse 10 is not 'the new covenant' of verse 8. For it is made 'after those days', after the days of the Judah call and the Samaritan call. It is a further covenant with the house of Israel, and more particularly not with the house of Judah. So the house of Israel gets two new covenants in the literal meaning of Jeremiah 31 and Hebrews 8. Just as the first new covenant was made with the Gentiles and the Proselytes as well, we can deduce that this further new covenant is made not just with the house of Israel but with everyone else except the house of Judah. This exclusion is typical of God's Justice. Judah got the first bite at the first new covenant so it is denied entrance into this further new covenant. Now just as the first new covenant meant a new church, even a new religion, so this further new covenant also means a second new church, it means a second new religion (although still Christian). This new church was actually started by Paul in 67Tishri - see U42. So there were two true Christian churches in the first presence of the Christ. The first presence of the Christ is the first period when 1NC saints existed on the earth. There are in fact two presences of the Christ - see I45. The first church of the second presence was an antitype of the first church of the first presence, the one started by Jesus and Peter. Both were churches run by and for the 1NC saints. The second church of the second presence is an antitype of the church set up by Paul. This 4th and last true church is the church of what we call the Second New Covenant. We cannot deduce the existence of the 2NC itself from the literal meaning of Jeremiah 31 or of Hebrew 8. We can only deduce it from the Symbolic meanings of these two scriptures, which is beyond the scope of this introduction. However if you want to see how we do it please see U42. Pause for thought
This further new covenant is so incredibly significant from a theological standpoint, that we are going to deduce it again a second time. It means for one thing that there has been or will be more than one true Christian church... 31 Look! There are days coming,
is the utterance of Jehovah, and I will conclude with the house of Israel
and with the house of Judah a new covenant; These 3 verses of scripture changed the course of religious history in the first century and the twentieth century. Verse 31 tells us that God will make a new covenant in 'days coming' with two houses. Verse 33 tells us that God will make a covenant after those days with one house. So the covenant referred to in verse 33 is made after the day of making the new covenant referred to in verse 31 with the house of Judah, and after the day of making the covenant referred to in verse 31 with the house of Israel. So there are two new covenants made with the house of Israel. Paul explains that Abraham's wives stand symbolically for covenantsWe can only see two subcovenants of the JAC, two spirit covenants, from the literal meaning of Jeremiah 31, which is also the literal meaning of Hebrews 8. These being the 1NC mediated by Jesus and the EHC mediated by Paul as discussed above. However it is more than apparent that there is no church of the EHC around today, since no one alive today has ever heard of that covenant except the Lord's Witnesses who do not claim to be the church of that covenant. One can see all of the other subcovenants of the JAC from applying the true bible code to Jeremiah 31 and Hebrews 8 which form two parallel accounts - see U11. However we are now going to venture into the bible code a little just to see what women stand for symbolically in bible accounts. Paul will guide us here. He is in fact giving us a symbolic interpretation, a decoding of Genesis 16! 22 For example, it is written that
Abraham acquired 2 sons, one by the servant girl
[Literal: the law - see verse 24 - the covenant from mount Sinai]
and one by the free [woman] [the holy spirit -
see verse 26 - the Jerusalem below was God's earthly administration in biblical
times, so the Jerusalem above is God's heavenly administration which is the holy
spirit, which is God's wife - see
I11]. Abraham had two wives, Sarah, and Hagar, her servant. Hagar gave him Ishmael, 'born in the manner of flesh' and then Sarah, gave him Isaac, who was 'born in the manner of the spirit' as Jesus was . So Isaac was non adamic as we know from I21. In any event Sarah was barren and 90 years old at the time of her delivery. Abraham is standing for God here, he is the one married to the holy spirit and to the nation of Israel through the Law of Moses. Incidentally Sarah cannot be the new covenant because Paul was not a first new covenant saint, he was actually the mediator of the EHC - see U11, yet he describes himself as being a child of the free woman. There is a fascinating and topical comparison between Ishmael the son of Hagar and the father genetically of the line through Mohammed to Islam, and Isaac the father of the line through Jesus to Christianity. Mohammed claimed descent from Ishmael. Today Muslims are slaves to punitive Islamic law just as the Jews were to the punitive Law of Moses, whereas true Christians are free from physical church laws today. With this in mind consider the prophetic declaration of God to Ishmael which applies to Ishmael and his sons in perpetuity... 11 Further Jehovah's angel added to her: Here you are
pregnant, and you shall give birth to a son and must call his name Ishmael,
for Jehovah has heard your affliction. This appears to be prophesying a World War between the sons of Ishmael and the rest of the sons of Adam. Furthermore this war will break out when the sons of Ishmael are living before the face of their brothers Jacob and Esau. Presently Isaac and Ishmael are hostile neighbors in the middle east, their faces are set against each other. Whatever the literal or greater meaning of the above explanation of Paul, he has certainly revealed that Genesis 16 is a symbolic drama which has a greater meaning wherein women stand for covenants. Furthermore there is a greater meaning relating to the geopolitics of the end of the world. This is a massively momentous revelation. Because the question that is then begged is: What is so special about Genesis 16 and these two wives of Abraham? Well to answer this please consider the words of Hosea. 1 When Israel was a boy, then I loved him, and out of
Egypt I called my son (Hosea 11). Absolutely true. God called and led his people Israel, the sons of Israel (whom he regards as the one person, Israel) out of Egypt after the 10 plagues. But Matthew says: 14 So he got up and
took along the young child and its mother by night and withdrew into Egypt, So the words of Hosea also have a greater meaning in addition to the literal meaning, wherein Israel stands for Jesus, who is another son of God who was called out of Egypt. So Genesis 16 is not alone in having a greater meaning. To cut a long story short, the LWs have discovered that since the whole bible has the same editor, all of it being inspired by God... 16 All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness (2 Timothy 3). It is all written in the same way. It is written in a code which defines how many greater meanings each scripture has. Some accounts have no greater meanings, and some have as many as 6 greater meanings. The holy scriptures are accounts written in this code. The grammatical code is the physical manifestation of the holiness of the scriptures. A bible book is holy, it is canonical if and only if it is written in the bible code. So with this in mind let us have a look at Genesis 25. [2] Keturah - Abraham's second wife after SarahAbraham had a child with Hagar, who was given to Abraham as woman/wife... 3 Then Sarai, Abram's wife, took
Hagar, the Egyptian, her maidservant, at the end of 10 years of Abram's dwelling
in the land of Canaan, and gave her to-Abram, her husband, to him for-wife. But she nonetheless, remained and continued to be referred to as Sarah's maidservant. Then we read in Genesis 25... 1 And he added Abraham and he took a
wife, and her name was Keturah. 7 And these are the days of the
years of Abraham's life which he lived, a hundred and seventy-five years. Keturah was initially a concubine of Abraham (1 Chronicles 1:32), but she finally became his wife. Whereas Hagar could not actually become his wife directly due to the interposition of Sarah between them in the ownership chain. Now one might think that God is condoning procreative sex outside marriage in the case of Hagar here. But one forgets that Abraham owned Sarah as his wife, and Sarah owned Hagar as her maidservant, so Abraham owned Hagar as his wife's maidservant. So Abraham had obligations to look after Hagar and their children, through the agreement/mechanism of slavery or servanthood. So his actions with Hagar were not irresponsible or sinful. Now Paul has already explained that Abraham's women stand for covenants. He said referring to Hagar and Sarah in Genesis 16... For these [women] mean covenants (Galatians 4:24). So here in Genesis 25 we have another two women of Abraham. And it is not a giant leap of inordinate symbolic agility to realize that these women also mean covenants. In fact have a second wife Keturah (since the account says that he 'again' took a wife and since it refers to 'Sarah, his wife') and we have also 'concubines'. So in total we have two wives and at least two concubines. Although Keturah was a concubine before she became his wife... 32 As for the sons of Keturah, Abraham's concubine, she
gave birth to Zimran and Jokshan and Medan and Midian and Ishbak and Shuah. And
the sons of Jokshan were Sheba and Dedan. So the account tells us that Abraham had two wives and one further concubine at the least. So these 3 women (Hagar, Sarah and Keturah) are 3 covenants of some sort in the greater meaning of Genesis 25. The Hebrew word for Keturah is hrw+q and is from the root r+q which means either: i Incense or Sacrificial Smoke 8 And when he took the scroll, the 4 living creatures and the 24 elders fell down before the Lamb, having each one a harp and golden bowls that were full of incense, and the [incense] means the prayers of the holy ones (Revelation 5). So Keturah symbolizes a covenant to do with difficult questions and knots and incense. Revelation quoted above explains that incense is the prayers we make, in this case about the meanings of the scriptures. We are not going to go fully into the symbolic meaning of Genesis 25, save to point out that if Sarah is the First New Covenant, then Keturah is a Second New covenant. For being another wife, she had the same marital status to Abraham that Sarah had. [3] Leah Bilhah Zilpah and Rachel - The 4 wives of JacobFollowing Paul's advice again we recognize that the 4 wives of Jacob must be telling us something about 4 salvation covenants. It is not hard to see the Jesus who procreated by baptism through 12 apostles is represented by Jacob who procreated by genetics through 12 sons. Genesis 30 lists the order of procreation from Jacob, as follows:
We know that there were 4 calls into the first new covenant (the Jewish call to the house of Judah, the proselyte call, the Samaritan call and the Gentile call). These calls are represented by the 4 sons, Reuben, Simeon, Levi and Judah respectively. Then there must have been 2 calls into the EHC, then 2 calls into the HHC, then 2 further calls into the 1NC, then 2 calls into the 2NC. Now you can see a very, very, important thing. There is a gap in the procreation of Leah. This is a gap in the new covenant saints. In fact this gap was 1800 years long, or '5 times' of no new covenant saint baptism - see U191. This is more or less the gap between the two presences of the Christ. He is present in body through his bride who is the new covenant saints as a group. But when there are no new covenant saints around, he is absent. You can also see 5 true Christian peoples (as regards spirit baptism), although we only have 4 true Christian religions as we understand it (from 4 Elijah's with 4 baptisms into the 2AC). In fact Bilhah and Zilpah were in the same religion, FDS2 - see U34. John and James prefigure the mediators of Bilhah and Rachel, who were Paul and Gordon. We do not know who mediated Zilpah at this point. [4] 'The New Covenant' is always referred to as 'a new covenant' in the scripturesNowhere in the scriptures, neither in Jeremiah, in Hebrews or in Luke, is what churches call the new covenant ever referred to as the new covenant. It is always referred to as a new covenant. It is only the cup of the new covenant itself that Jesus calls 'The new covenant'. 20 Also, the cup
in the same way after they had the evening meal, he saying: This cup means
the new covenant by virtue of my blood, which is to be poured out in your
behalf (Luke 22). 31 Look!
There are days coming, is the utterance of Jehovah, and I will conclude with the
house of Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant (Jeremiah 31). If 'the' new covenant is merely 'a' new covenant, then there is at least one further new covenant in addition to it, so there are at least 2 new covenants. It is as simple as that. [5] Plural Keys of the Kingdom mean plural temples in the KingdomHere is the famous scripture where Jesus gave Peter the Keys of the Kingdom... 18 Also, I say to you, You are Peter, and on this
rock-mass I will build my congregation [with
you as the first stone placed on me the rock-mass], and the gates of
Hades will not overpower it. It is a famous scripture that none of us have understood for centuries upon centuries. Here again we see another classic example of mankind's spiritual blindness. Most Christian churches interpret these 3 keys as 3 calls into the Christian church, one to the Jews which they say occurred at Pentecost in Acts 2, one to the Samaritans which occurred in Acts 8 and one to the Gentiles which occurred in Acts 10. The LWs fell victim to an improved version of this flawed and daft understanding until March 2006 (Wednesday 22nd evening or Friday 24th evening). Our mistake falls into the same category as the catholic based misinterpretation of Matthew 28:19... 19 Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit (Matthew 28). For millennia Christians have mistranslated this baptism and being: In the name of the father and of the son and of the holy spirit, and therefore misinterpreted it as meaning one baptism with the authority of 3 persons. Whereas the Greek says: Into the name of the father and of the son and of the holy spirit, and so this is three baptisms into 3 different covenants, gaining 3 different covenant surnames - see I32. The Emblem of the Papacy (wikipedia) has 2 keys depicted. Likewise the Vatican Arms has the same 2 keys...
Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pope) reveals that the Catholics understand the silver key to represent the power to bind and loose on earth and the gold key represents the power to bind and loose in heaven. This is such an awful perversion of the truth, so typical of the catholic church. The scripture says that the thing bound on earth will be the thing bound in heaven and likewise for the thing loosed. In other words Matthew 16:19 is declaring a correspondence between earthly and heavenly law, not a division between them! The angels are constrained to honor the laws of the true church of imperfect men. Returning now to the 3 key interpretation. If the 3 keys are 3 calls into the 1NC, then we have 3 keys to the same door. This plainly will not work. For when we open the first key the door will still be locked shut by the other 2 keys. The correct analogy for calls into the 1NC is calls to board an airplane through a departure gate. The gate is opened with one key and then different groups are called one after the other. But there is only one key and only one gate at the airport. So for centuries most Christian churches had 1NC saints entering in through a locked door - something that Jesus could do after he had been resurrected as a spirit, yes, but not something men can do, other than in Harry Potter movies. Now the bible plainly declares that the house Jehovah has one key, not three keys... 27 And all around the house of the [true] God they would spend the night; for guard service was upon them, and they were in charge of the key, even [to open up] from morning to morning (1 Chronicles 9). 22 And I will put the key of the house of David upon his shoulder, and he must open without anyone's shutting, and he must shut without anyone's opening (Isaiah 22). There is one key per house. So if Peter is given the Keys (plural) of the Kingdom, then the Kingdom has at least two houses in it. These are two temples, two worship systems. This means that there are at least two covenants and at least two true religions (successively) under Peter. So here we have found at least two True Christian Churches and at least two Christian covenants, for each true church has a covenant, and each true Christian church has a spirit covenant.. Putting this all together, there is an earthly temple and a heavenly temple and each one has a key and there are in fact two keys to the kingdom under Peter's control. This means that the catholic insignia are spot on. Now this cannot be a coincidence. Furthermore the bible uses gold to represent the 1NC saints (called first and of higher authority) and silver to represent the 2NC saints (called second and of lower authority). So the the Catholic insignia demonstrates divine decoded knowledge. So the Catholics once knew about earthly temple covenants and about the symbolic code of the bible, in fact they knew all about them from TCC2, the church initially of the EHC, the covenant mediated by Paul - see I29. So they have suppressed this information since it condemned them. But God is now re-supplying us with the same information. So these plural keys are the simplest possible proof of a second temple of true worship, which requires a second covenant amongst other things, since God creates no worship system without a covenant. [6] The 4 calls into the Second New CovenantThis section is technical but included here for completeness. Here is a table of the 4 calls into the 2NC whose timings are deduced from the fundamental pattern as applied to FDS4 in U42 and from the woman with a flow of blood 12 years of Luke 8:40-56 and Mark 5:22-43.
22
Now one [eiV]
of the
synagogue-rulers
[partitive genitive] [A specific Watchtower ruler, but not
the Watchtower ruler: Obadiah of 1 Kings 18, the guy who baptizes prophets of
Jehovah in the JWs to be internal LWs, the president of Laodicea],
Jairus
by
name,
comes and having seen him
[This does not have to be Jesus, it is Jesus in
the literal account, but in the word symbolism the pronoun is yet to be defined
so it can be anyone - Gordon, he sees him as a result of the first birth pang],
he falls towards his
feet [Gordon's feet are temporally the later members of
his body, which are in contact wit the earth. The 2NC kings and lords in FDS4.
Is this 10x? Subject/Object??]
Mark and Luke: Peter (3), James (2), John (2), Father (2), Mother (2), Jesus (7). 3 threads. The girl being 12 is just starting to bleed as a woman, just starting to be able to give birth, whereas the woman with the flow of blood for 12 years is just stopping bleeding as a woman in such a way as to make herself unclean. [7] The children of Jerusalem above are more numerous than those of Jerusalem below22 For example, it is written that Abraham
acquired 2 sons, one by the servant girl and one by the free woman; 1 Cry out joyfully, you barren woman that did not give birth! Become cheerful with a joyful outcry and cry shrilly, you that had no childbirth pains, for the sons of the desolated one are more numerous than the sons of the woman with a husbandly owner, Jehovah has said (Isaiah 54). So the children of the Jerusalem above, who is plainly a woman, being able to
have children, but not through birth, since these are angelic kids. are more
numerous than those of the Jerusalem below, which was the sons of Hagar, the
sons of the law, the sons of Israel. But the Jerusalem above has children
generated from above, born again, born in the manner of the spirit. 20 and through him to reconcile again to himself all [other] things by making peace through the blood [he shed] on the torture stake, no matter whether they are the things upon the earth or the things in the heavens (Colossians 1). If we read the rest of Isaiah 54 we see that Paul's interpretation that the desolate woman, is Jerusalem above is correct. And that our interpretation (which is also the gnostic interpretation) that she is the holy spirit, God's wife is correct as well. 2 Make the place of your tent more
spacious. And let them stretch out the tent cloths of your grand tabernacle. Do
not hold back. Lengthen out your tent cords, and make those tent pins of yours
strong. The point we are getting to is that the number of saints, born again sons of God before Jesus united God with his second wife through his death and mediation of the second holy spirit covenant, is greater than the number of physical Jews ever born. That is a lot of born again humans before Jesus. Form there we deduce that there will be more than 144,000 born again humans after Jesus fixed God's wife. But this does not in fact state that explicitly. Obviously once the holy spirit was poured out at Pentecost, we are not going to get less born again saints than we got before it was poured out! To put this in perspective. Jesus is the head of the second holy spirit, the
head of God's wife, the mediator of that covenant, whilst being himself husband
of his own wife, the 144,000 1NC saints who are the holy spirit of the Kingdom
of God, the 3rd holy spirit really. This then is the 3rd heaven that Paul saw -
we think. |
Now you can easily search the Lords' Witnesses website!
A Personal Letter to all of my Friends and Family
For those who wish to help us spread the "Good News"
|
