The Lords' Witnesses                                                   

The Lord said: " Keep on asking, and it will be given you; keep on seeking, and you will find; keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you." (Matthew 7:7)

 

 

euei     German Site  Hebrew Site   euei

Home

Latest Briefs

11/07//09

News Center!

11/09//09 

Table of Contents

Downloads Page

Acronyms

Terms

Apologetics

Library

Lords' Witnesses

Blog Spot

Report Broken Links

Contact Info

Help

Terms
Acronyms
Home


 

What About Christmas???

Traditions of Men  

 

1 Hear ye the word which the LORD speaketh unto you, O house of Israel :

2 Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.

3 For the customs of the people [are] vain: for [one] cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.

4 They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. (Jer 10)

 

When it comes to traditions, we only have to reach for the bible to learn what is and isn’t acceptable in the eyes of Jehovah.  We are given specific instructions as to what we are to celebrate and succinctly, we are given specific warnings as to what not to do with regard to traditions.  The reason I started this section out with a scriptural passage is to demonstrate to you, the reader, that the views on this website are not based on personal biases but on the truth and discerning sound doctrines based solely on the scriptures themselves.  The fundamental questions you as a Christian must ask is this:

 

Who really profits from alienating the word of God.  Do you seek to please men and persecute Christ as Saul did, or would you rather glorify God in righteousness through our Lord as Paul did?

13 For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews' religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it:

14 And profited in the Jews' religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers. (Gal 1)

   

These same men whom Saul tried so hard to please confronted Jesus with a question regarding this very subject: 

 

1 Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,

2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread. (Mat 15)

 

The whole reason for this scripture is to belabor the point that we are not to follow the traditions of our elders, but do as the bible tells us.  One of the greatest traditions of the Christian masses is Christmas.  There exist no scripture in the entire bible that commands us to keep this celebratory practice and in fact there is no mention of such a thing from any of the disciples.

 

The harsh reality of this holiday (Named after "holy day") is that it is actually condemned by the scriptures as you will soon realize.  Jesus was pretty stern with the Pharisees when he answered their question:

 

Mt 15:3

3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?

4 For God commanded, saying, Honor thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.

5 But ye say, Whosoever shall say to [his] father or [his] mother, [It is] a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;

6 And honor not his father or his mother, [he shall be free]. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.

 

So the Pharisees forsook God’s commandments in favor of their traditions.  So what does God think of all this?  We only need to look at Jesus' response to the Pharisees for the answer.

 

7 [Ye] hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,

8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with [their] lips; but their heart is far from me.

9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching [for] doctrines the commandments of men. (Mat 15)

 

Christmas is a perfect example of honoring God with our lips but it is one of many vain doctrines and commandments of men.  As stated before, there are no scriptures that tell us to celebrate the birth or death of any one!  It is especially insulting to both our Father in the heavens and His Son in the fact that a pagan ritual is used in the process!

 

It is well known by many Christians that the Catholic traditions of Lent, Ash Wednesday, etc. are paganistic but most fail to recognize that the same types of pagan elements exist in the celebration of Christmas and Easter! The question we must ask is how did they start and why?  Once we understand this we should be able to put the issue to rest once and for all.

 

The following is a quote from the 2000 Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 11; page 390.

 

"During the later periods of Roman history, sun worship gained in importance and ultimately led to what has been called a 'solar monotheism.' Nearly all the gods of the period were possessed of solar qualities, and both Christ and Mithra acquired the traits of solar deities. The feast of Sol and Victus (open unconquered Sun) on December 25th was celebrated with great joy, and eventually this date was taken over by the Christians as Christmas, the birthday of Christ."

 

Notice how it says "both Christ and Mithra acquired the traits of solar deities"? The Christians were apparently trying to get more converts so they tried to "paganize" the Messiah to make Him more attractive to pagans. They even officially brought the feast of the unconquered sun into their worship in 336 AD. This in a nutshell is the origin of Christmas.

 

But the real question is, "Who converted who?" Do we murder to bring a murderer to Christ? Do we rape to bring a rapist to the Messiah? It is true that by 336AD, the mainstream beliefs of Christianity were already that far from the truth the apostles suffered so much to teach.  Despite all of this, shouldn't true believers be teaching the unbelievers the true way of Jehovah rather than the unbelievers teaching believers these pagan customs and practices? May it always be! Yet, the so called "Christians" not only learned these heathen ways, they also incorporated them into their worship. We are told to look into these things and reprove them:

 

11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove [them]. (Eph 5)

 

Today, Christmas is the most popular holiday among “Christians” however, what is popular is not always right and what is right is not always popular. Christmas means 'mass for Christ'. The name of the holiday is much newer than the holiday itself. The customs associated with Christmas (Not Christmas itself), in one form or another, have been celebrated for literally thousands of years. 'Christmas' is just a new name for an old pagan holiday.

 

There is no doubt that the customs that are associated with Christmas, as well as the idea of a deity being born on December 25th are of pagan origin. One need only look to an encyclopedia or even many local newspapers in the 12th month of the year to find this truth. The real issue is whether or not we should walk in these customs. I know many of you may be asking, "So what is so bad about it"?  Isn't it just for the children? My question to you is "What should we be teaching our children"? The truth or a bevy of lies?

 

The truth is that the Jesus was not born on December 25th, Do not make the mistake in thinking this information is new!  Even though until recently the actual date of Jesus birth was not known, the catholic church knew it wasn't December 25th long before Christmas was introduced!  The fact of the matter is, Jesus was born on 10Tishri2BCE.  

 

However December 25th is the birthday of nearly every pagan god ever invented! The pagan customs associated with Christmas are clearly condemned in the scriptures. Paganism and/or Idolatry is not only contrary to the Word of God, but downright blasphemous.

 

The scriptures are very clear on this as you have already read in the beginning of this section:

 

1 Hear ye the word which the LORD speaketh unto you, O house of Israel :

2 Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.

3 For the customs of the people [are] vain: for [one] cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.

4 They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. (Jer 10)

 

So here we have a scripture that is pretty clear to even the untrained “bible decoder” in its message.  That being: LEARN NOT THE WAY OF THE HEATHEN.  It’s bad enough that people have not only learned it, but they have purposely incorporated it into a ritual of worship to the Christ!!!  Until when will you stop piercing the very one who through His undeserved kindness and love for you suffered so greatly!

 

Secondly, we are warned not to be dismayed at the signs of the heaven  There is a specific reason this is stated here.  History tells us that when people saw that the sun began to go further away from the earth and the days started growing shorter in the winter, the sun worshipping Gentiles were "dismayed", and feared that the sun would not return. So they held certain festivals just after the time of the Winter Solstice when it began to return and lengthen the days. This return of the sun is why December 25th is the birthday of so many solar deities. One of the customs of the pagans was to cut down a tree in the forest, fasten it with nails so it would not topple and then decorate it!  Gee, does this sound familiar???

 

There are millions upon millions of so called "Christians" out there who to this day continue practicing this obvious abomination to God...mostly out of ignorance I would guess.  For this tradition has been propagated by the church for hundreds of years giving the impression that it must not only be the right thing to do, but even the righteous thing to do also!  This is a damning lie and woe to them that continue it even after knowing the truth about it.  The scriptures cannot be any clearer.  This is a tradition of men the kind both Jehovah and our Lord Christ Jesus warned us about on several occasions.

 

I must ask you, is this the kind of thing you need a living prophet to come and explain to you?  Should we not all pick up a bible and reprove each other from time to time?

 

This custom of Christmas, along with other pagan rituals are clearly condemned in Jeremiah’s passage but it does not end there. Their are many other customs associated with this holiday including mistletoe, the Yule log and of course one of Satan’s greatest accomplishments (in destroying the faith of our children) is Santa Claus. I like to refer to it as Satan’s Claws due to the powerful nature of the lie it bestows.  Santa is portrayed as a bigger than life character that children actually learn to look up to in place of the true God of Israel. 

 

Think about it.  Parents purposely and deliberately lie to their children and tell them that they should fear Santa Claus because "he knows if you've been bad or good" when they should be telling them to fear Jehovah!  These same parents also lie to their children about the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy. Then they wonder why their children become liars and many lose their faith in the Messiah later on in life. Our children look up to us as parents and believe everything we say until they realize that we have been lying to them most of their life.  It isn’t a wonder our societies are becoming increasingly secular. 

 

How many commandments must we break?  Are we not told that any one of them is like breaking all of them?  The whole of Christmas and its traditions is a big pack of lies from the foundation up.  Despite the warnings we are given regarding the activity of "worshipping" a tree and the "roots of traditions of men", it would seem continuing this practice widely accepted.  The fact of the matter is, Santa does not exist, he is not coming to bring presents to our kids, flying reindeer don’t exist, and the Messiah was not born on Dec 25th!!!! 

 

Did Jehovah not harshly condemn leaders who taught lies?  So who is ultimately responsible for this holiday?  Well we don’t have to go far to answer that question for we all know who the father of the lie is.

 

44 You are from your father the Devil, and you wish to do the desires of your father. That one was a manslayer when he began, and he did not stand fast in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaks the lie, he speaks according to his own disposition, because he is a liar and the father of [the lie] (John 8).

 

It's high time that we forsake these lies and abide in the truth! Let's forsake this foolish practice of yoking the Messiah who said "I am the TRUTH" together with lies, for He has nothing to do with lies. Let’s be perfectly clear about this shall we!!”

 

14 Blessed [are] they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.

15 For without [are] dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie. (Rev 22)

 

I am certainly aware that this kind of chastising will cause many to flinch and some to be down right contentious, but that can be expected because it is much easier to live with a convenient lie than to live with the inconvenient truth.  But this is not about physical life, it is about judicial life.  Those of us who do our best to understand the scriptures and abide by them are striving for judicial life and a chance to live in the Kingdom of God.  Those who would rather live with the commandments of men for fear of losing their status, or power, or even having to live with ridicule and shame according to those very men should take heed.  For the witness of God and the prophecy of scripture is alive and exerting power as you read this.

 

I know you may be thinking, "Well I don't really worship the tree, so what is the harm"? Well, let's take this to the next level.  Not only is it sinful in the eyes of Jehovah to practice these traditions of men, but it is also a sin to take the traditions of pagans and apply them to the worship of Jehovah (i.e. Christmas or Christ Mass).  He starts out with a warning to the children of Israel…..

 

29 When the LORD thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land;

30 Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou enquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise. (De 12)

 

In other words, do not even ask how they served other gods for it may lead to idolatry!

 

31 Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods. (De12)

 

How plain can this get? "Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God:" It is abundantly clear. Do not worship Jehovah in that way, the way of the heathen! Do not add to His commandments and do not take away from His commandments.

 

Both Christmas and Easter take pagan festivals and traditions and apply them to the worship of Jehovah and or His Christ. This is clearly condemned here. Would it be right to take a satanic holiday that Satanists have invented and then incorporate that holiday into the worship of Jehovah? Certainly not! Yet all paganism is born of Satanism. Satan is behind all pagan worship. And whatever god the idolaters worship, they are actually worshipping Satan. 

 

20 Rather, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice to demons and not to Elohim, and I do not want you to have fellowship with demons. (1 Co 10)

 

If you participate in these paganistic rituals, you are having fellowship with demons.  So what might the ramifications be to those who continue this practice?  Carefully consider this next verse:

 

21 You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the Lords table and of the table of demons. (1 Co 10)

 

It is up to all of us as individuals to make the choice as to whether or not we can drink of His cup.  So the question is: "Which table will you choose?"

 

And remember:

 

19 We are aware that we are out of God, and the whole world is lying in the wicked one. (1 Jn 5)   

For a more in-depth look at the formal history of Christmas and other pagan holidays continue on. Please visit the links at the bottom of the page for more on this subject.

The True Meaning of Christmas

by Joel R.J. Tennuchi

Christmas, is it really about Christ? Does it really signify the birth of our Lord and Savior? For the vast majority of people the question is really no question at all. Is Christmas about Christ "Of course it is! What could be more Christ like than Christmas? Isn't it Jesus’ birthday?" Others have begun to feel increasingly uncomfortable with the celebration of Christmas. When they look at the goings on that takes place around December 25th, there is an uneasy feeling that something is just not right. And yet they keep telling themselves, "Isn't Christmas Jesus' birthday? In my opinion, after deliberating about Christmas, I have come to a very powerful conclusion.

There is nothing “Christian” about Christmas. Christmas is basically and essentially Pagan. If this thought comes as a shock to you, then I invite you to consider other the possibility that for you Christmas is a blind spot that needs some re-examination.

To say that I am not impressed with the sentimental appeal of the “holiday spirit” would be a meaningful gesture. There is a certain appeal about this season of the year, the thought of family gatherings, dreaming of a “White Christmas” as Bing Crosby once wrote about, "chestnuts roasting on an open fire," "city streets, busy streets, dressed in festive cheer."  No one with any sentimentality could escape a twinge of nostalgia when there's a feeling of Christmas in the air. Even the most hardened cynic can't stifle a softening childlike feeling of good will that lasts for a few days.

I’ve tried though very hard to understand the true meaning of Christmas, yet no matter how hard I try, I can’t seem to grasp the element of trying to put “Christ” back into Christmas. Christmas as we know it today is a product of mass commercialization, it is a time where people forget the “Christian” aspect and in place add their own version. Well, this is not the case. I have undergone some research into “the true meaning of Christmas” and here in this article I ask you "What is the true meaning of Christmas?" When you get right down to its essence, what is Christmas? Where did it come from? How did it originate? What does it stand for now? The real question is the nature of the institution itself. 

I think you will be shocked if you evaluate the institution of Christmas realistically. What I'm asking you to do is lay aside your cultural prejudices and preferences, and approach this question with an open mind. Granted, that's hard to do. We are so snowed under a century of tradition and nostalgia that it's almost impossible for some people to look at the issue objectively at all. I'm asking you to put aside your preconceived notions, at least temporarily, to look honestly at this institution we call Christmas. Frankly, this article is calculated to disturb you, to make you think, and to cause you to change your actions if they are not consistent with the truth of the gospel.

I. What is Christmas?

What is the origin of Christmas? How did it begin? Were its beginnings pagan or Christian? There is no indication in the New Testament that the early Christians observed Christmas at all. It can be demonstrated in church history that, for probably the first 300 years after the birth of Christ, Christians knew nothing of Christmas celebration. It was only as the Church began to drift from apostolic doctrine and practice into corruption that Christmas began.

Where did it come from? Where did the drifting Church get the ideas and customs associated with Christmas today? The source of most of the basic forms of paganism in the ancient world can be traced back to the Babylonian "mysteries." All of the ancient cultures, Egypt, Greece, Rome, even India and China, had beliefs, traditions, practices, gods and goddesses that were related to those found in Babylon. The names were different, and different modifications were added, but basically the ancient religions were related and find their "purest" form in Babylonia . In the Old Testament Babylon stands as the epitome of everything that is godless and perverse. The greatest indignation suffered by God's people for their sins is to be carried away into Babylonian captivity, into the heart of the heathen world.

In the New Testament, Babylon becomes the Roman Catholic Church. The Roman Empire corrupted the first true Christian church, and result was what is now called the Roman Catholic Church. Jesus advised his followers to be no part of the world, but his followers concluded a deal with the Roman Empire and became corrupt. The Roman Empire embodied the pagan beliefs and practices of ancient Babylon and is seen as the arch-enemy of God's people. 

What was to be the attitude of God's people toward this " Babylon " of their day? "Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues" (Rev. 18:4). But, did God's people hear the warning and separate themselves from Babylon ? Well yes as a matter of fact they did. When a command is written in Revelation it is followed, and those in the first church who loved the glory of God more than the glory of man, left it and joined the second church. St Peter was among them. He joined the second church found by St. Paul in 79Nisan. 

But those who remained in the new Babylon , the Roman Catholic church, the mother of all of the harlot churches continually compromised with Rome and became contaminated with pagan corruption. In 313 AD the Roman Emperor Constantine supposedly adopted the Christian faith and declared it to be the official religion of his realm. His embracing the Christian Church proved detrimental to true Christianity. Constantine retained the traditional pagan titles, and his coins still bore the figures and names of the old Roman Gods.

This corrupted Church over time became "the Roman Catholic Church" and its method was to compromise with paganism in order to gain numbers to the congregation. Ever since, the Roman Catholic way of converting pagans to its style of worship has been to absorb them gradually, along with their idolatrous observances. The church was content to swell the number of nominal adherents by meeting paganism halfway. There were some valiant voices of protest who bitterly lamented the inconsistency of this approach, but their voices were raised in vain.

The Roman church has continued the same approach until this day. It can be seen particularly in Central and South America , where idols have simply been replaced with statues of the saints. Some of their names and traditions have even been combined. Roman Catholic churches in these countries are often opened to the Indians for the worship of their animistic gods.

How then did we receive our holidays (holy days) with their customs and traditions? Christmas as well as Easter, Halloween, and Mardi Gras? Each of them has come to us from ancient Babylon , through Rome , through the Roman Catholic church.

It was for this very reason that in the city of Geneva in Switzerland in Calvin's day you could have been fined or imprisoned for celebrating Christmas. It was at the request of the Westminster Assembly that the English Parliament in 1644 passed an act forbidding the observance of Christmas, calling it a heathen holiday. In an appendix to their "Directory for the Public Worship of God" the Westminster divines said: "There is no day commanded in scripture to be kept holy under the gospel but the Lord's day, which is the Christian Sabbath. Festival days, vulgarly called 'Holy-days', having no warrant in the word of God, are not to be continued."

When the Puritans came to America they passed similar laws. The early New Englanders worked steadily through December 25, 1620, in studied neglect of the day. About 40 years later the General Court of Massachusetts decreed punishment for those who kept the season: "...anyone who is found observing, by abstinence from labor, feasting, or any other way, any such days as Christmas Day, shall pay for every such offence five shillings."

It was not until the 19th century that Christmas had any religious significance in Protestant churches. Even as late as 1900, Christmas services were not held in Southern Presbyterian churches. The PCUS General Assembly of 1899 declared: "There is no warrant in Scripture for the observance of Christmas and Easter as holidays, rather the contrary (see Gal. 4:9-11; Col. 2:16-21), and such observance is contrary to the principles of the Reformed Faith, conducive to will-worship, and not in harmony with the simplicity of the gospel of Jesus Christ."

II. The History of Christmas

What then is the history of Christmas?  The ignoble nature of the origins and customs of Christmas can be found in many standard reference sources; therefore, we will not dwell on them in great detail. It is appropriate, however, to mention a few highly significant facts pertaining to the origins behind Christmas.

Evidence points to the fourth century as the time when Christmas celebration began. Records covering the first three centuries of New Testament church history mention an increasing significance given to the period from Passover to Pentecost; yet, evidence is lacking to prove any celebration regarding the Savior’s birth.

In the middle of the third century, Origin gives a list of fasts and festivals which were observed in his time, and no mention is made of Christmas. The lack of such testimony supports the conclusion that no celebration was then observed.

Although there was no Christmas observance at this time, there were various pagan celebrations held in conjunction with the winter solstice.

In Scandinavia , the great feast of Yule with all its various ceremonies, had celebrated the birth of the winter sun-god. In the Latin countries there reigned Saturnalia, a cult of the god Saturn. The date December 25, coincided also with the birth of Attis, a Phrygian cult of the sun-god, introduced into Rome under the Empire. The popular feasts attached to the births of other sun-gods such as Mithras, were also invariably celebrated at the time of the winter solstice.

The transition from festivals commemorating the birth of a sun god to a celebration ostensibly for the Son of God occurred sometime in the fourth century. Unable to eradicate the heathen celebration of Saturnalia, the Church of Rome, sometime before 336 AD, designated a Feast of the Nativity to be observed.

Many of the customs associated with Christmas also took their origins from the heathen observances. The exchanging of gifts, extravagant merriment, and lighting of candles all have previous counterparts in the Roman Saturnalia. The use of trees harkens back to the pagan Scandinavian festival of Yule.

This process of assimilation is characteristic of Roman Catholicism throughout the centuries. Within Roman Catholicism, there is no policy designed to eradicate such heathen practices; rather, the general practice is to foster assimilation by replacing pagan superstitions with similar ecclesiastical institutions. An example of this policy is illustrated by a letter which Pope Gregory wrote to Abbot Mellitus on how to order things in Britain (AD 606):

The temples of the idols among the people should on no account be destroyed. The idols themselves are to be destroyed, but the temples themselves are to be aspersed with holy water, altars set up in them, and relics deposited there. For if these temples are well-built, they must be purified from the worship of demons and dedicated to the service of the true God. In this way, we hope that the people, seeing that their temples are not destroyed, may abandon their error and, flocking more readily to their accustomed resorts, may come to know and adore the true God. And since they have a custom of sacrificing many oxen to demons, let some other solemnity be substituted in its place, such as a day of Dedication or Festivals of the holy martyrs whose relics are enshrined there. On such occasion they might well construct shelters of boughs for themselves around the churches that were once temples, and celebrate the solemnity with devout feasting.

This is quite a program! The church is encouraged to give the pagans ecclesiastical relics, rites, ceremonies, and festive celebrations as a substitute for their heathen ones. This policy differs greatly from the conduct of the children of God who cut down sacred groves, destroyed the remnants of idolatry, or burned their heathen books in order to make a clean break with pagan ways (Ex. 34:13; Deut. 12:2-4, 29-32; 2Kings 18:4; Acts 19:19).

The theory of conquest through assimilation is only too apparent in an examination of Christmas. A casual glance will show how the holiday incorporates heathen observances on a world-wide scale. Each culture seems to have its own local "contribution" to the celebration of Christmas. The serious question for the Christian is this: Are we not commanded, "Learn not the way of the heathen" (Jer. 10:2)?

Along with Rome's direct infusion of paganism, the papal church has added some novelties of its own. The principal perversion is the celebration of the Mass. Since the middle ages, the concept of transubstantiation has been an integral part of Popish worship. Roman Catholics contend that the communion elements are transformed into the actual body and blood of Christ, in order to offer a re-sacrifice of Christ,­ a sacrifice which is said to possess propitiatory merits. The Mass is a blasphemous assault upon the finality and perfection of Christ's sacrifice on the cross of Calvary (Cf. Heb. 9:12, 24-26; 10:10-14).

The Mass is the pre-eminent feature of Christmas celebration. "In the Roman Catholic Church three masses are usually said to symbolize the birth of Christ eternally in the bosom of the Father, from the womb of Mary, and mystically in the soul of the faithful.

The concept of the Mass is embedded in the English term Christmas, its etymology being traced to the Old English words Christes maesse, meaning "the mass or festival of Christ."

Because of its pagan and papal associations, Christmas met strong objections during and after the Protestant Reformation. This opposition was especially forceful among Presbyterians.

III. Opposition to the Celebration of Christmas

The celebration of Christmas seemed to be opposed by many, some of these dated back to the early days of the sixteenth century. This was the case in the city of Geneva . The Register of Ministers in Geneva (1546) records a list of "faults which contravene the Reformation." Among the directives regarding "Superstitions" is the following: "Those who observe Romish festivals or fasts shall only be reprimanded, unless they remain obstinately rebellious."

On Sunday, 16 November 1550, an edict was issued concerning holidays; it was a decree "respecting the abrogation of all festivals, with the exception of Sundays, which God had ordained."

This ban on festival days (including Christmas) caused an uproar in certain quarters, and Calvin was reproached as the instigator of the action.

Calvin's personal writings about holidays, in this instance, are somewhat ambiguous. He says he was not directly involved in the decision. In personal correspondence with John Haller (pastor in Berne ), Calvin writes, "Before I ever entered the city, there were no festivals but the Lord's day." He added, "If I had got my choice, I should not have decided in favor of what has now been agreed upon.”

It seems that Calvin was initially uneasy about the edict to ban the festivals, because he feared that the "sudden change" might provoke tumult which could impede the course of the Reformation. Nevertheless, in the same letter to Haller, Calvin says, "Although I have neither been the mover nor instigator to it, yet, since it has so happened, I am not sorry for it."

King James I

Another of those who strongly opposed Christmas was King James I . When King James took the English throne, he disallowed Presbyterianism and became an advocate of the Anglican Church government, because it was more compatible with his notions of monarchy.

At the Assembly of Perth, in 1617, the king sought to impose various ceremonies designed to enhance the Episcopal cause. The liturgical impositions included receiving communion in a kneeling position, private administration of the sacraments, Episcopal confirmation, and the observance of Christmas, Easter, Whitsuntide, and the Ascension. Scottish ministers resisted this action, with a supplication against all points of the program.

David Calderwood (1575-1651) represents the firm opposition given by faithful Scottish ministers. He issued a pointed critique of the Perth Assembly, published in 1619, in which he attacked these innovations in worship that were imposed upon the Church of Scotland.  In a section on festival days, Calderwood asserts that only God has the prerogative "to appoint a day of rest and to sanctify it to his honor." Under the law of God, no one presumed to appoint holy days "but God, and that either by Himself, or by some extraordinary direction."

Moreover, the anniversary days prescribed by God "pertained to the ceremonial law; but so it is that the ceremonial law is abolished. The anniversary days were distinguished from the moral Sabbath;" only the ordinary (weekly) Sabbath remains. "The moral use of the ordinary Sabbath was for the service of God in general both private and public. The mystical use [of the anniversary days] was to be a memorial of things bypassed, and a shadow of things to come. The moral use endures, the mystical uses are vanished." "The Judicial days had once that honor, as to be appointed by God himself; but the anniversary days appointed by men have not the like honor."

Calderwood continues, "If it had been the will of God that the several acts of Christ should have been celebrated with several solemnities, the Holy Ghost would have made known to us the day of his nativity, circumcision, presentation in the temple, baptism, transfiguration, and the like." "This opinion of Christ's nativity on the 25th day of December was bred at Rome ." He then exposes some of the preposterous Romish claims made for the 25th day of December as the day of Christ's birth; and he notes inconsistent claims, made in previous centuries, for other dates on the calendar, as the day of the Savior’s nativity.

"The diversity of the ancients observing some the 6th day of January, some the 19th day of April, some the 19th of May, some the 25th day of December, argues that the Apostles never ordained it." "You see then as God hid the body of Moses, so has he hid this day, and other days depending on the calculation of it, wherein he declared his will concerning the other days of his notable acts: to wit, that not Christ's action, but Christ's institution makes a day holy." "Nay, let us utter the truth, December-Christmas is a just imitation of the December-Saturnal of the ethnic [heathen] Romans, and so used as if Bacchus, and not Christ, were the God of Christians."

"It is commonly objected, that we may as well keep a day for the nativity, as for the resurrection of Christ. We have answered already, that Christ's day, or the Lord's Day, is the day appointed for remembrance of his nativity, and all his action and benefits, as well as for the resurrection."

Further, says Calderwood, even supposing that the keeping of holy days was initially indifferent, the festival days must now be abolished, because "they are abused and polluted with superstition." Indeed, the brazen serpent was originally constructed by God's express command; yet it was destroyed when it became a snare to the people of God (2 Kings 18:4). How much more, then, should we discard man-made observances which are additionally contaminated with Romish superstition and idolatry.

IV. Other Opposed Views

We have seen that Presbyterian opposition to Christmas is consistent, historical, and based upon solid scriptural considerations. Yet, Presbyterians were not the only persons who maintained a strong stand against Christmas and kindred corruptions of worship; there were other Christians who held similar convictions. For example, the famous Baptist preacher Charles H. Spurgeon opened a sermon on 24 December 1871 with the following words:

“We have no superstitious regard for times and seasons. Certainly we do not believe in the present ecclesiastical arrangement called Christmas: first, because we do not believe in the mass at all, but abhor it, whether it be said or sung in Latin or in English; and, secondly, because we find no scriptural warrant whatever for observing any day as the birthday of the Savior; and, consequently, its observance is a superstition, because not of divine authority.”

V. Concluding Thoughts

A few final words remain for those who claim to be “Christians”. The Protestant Reformers summoned us back to the scriptural law of worship which allows us to admit only those institutions in worship that possess express scriptural warrant. To take a stand in support of Christmas is a repudiation of this legacy of the Reformation. It is a retreat from a hard-won point of orthodoxy.

A consistent application of Reformed and Presbyterian principles of worship requires the repudiation of Christmas. Answer 109 of the Westminster Larger Catechism forbids "any wise approving, any religious worship not instituted by God himself.”

The issue is not a matter of indifference. Since Christmas was not instituted by God, it should not be approved or tolerated in the official practices of the Church. Ministers and church officers are not being true to their ordination vows, if they encourage or tolerate Christmas observance in their congregations.

Moreover, the obligation to protect our families from corrupt worship resides with all heads of households. We must strive to follow the example of Abraham, who received a commendation from the Lord: "I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the Lord" (Gen. 18:19).

At the outset of the Reformation in Scotland , John Knox issued the following charge to the heads of households:

You are ordained of God to rule your own houses in his true fear, and according to his Word. Within your own houses, I say, in some cases, you are bishops and kings; your wife, children, servants, and family are your bishopric and charge; of you it shall be required how carefully and diligently you have always instructed them in God's true knowledge, how that you have studied in them to plant virtue and repress vice.

Of course, there are always those who agree "in principle," but offer lame excuses for their reticence to apply their beliefs to their actions. To such men, the words of Gillespie stand as an appropriate exhortation:

Do not reckon it enough to bear within the enclosure of your secret thoughts a certain dislike of the ceremonies and other abuses now set afoot, except both by profession and action you evidence the same, and show your faith by your fact. We are constrained to say to some among you, with Elijah, "How long shalt ye between two opinions?" and call unto you with Moses, "Who is on the Lord's side? Who?" "Be not deceived: God is not mocked." And, "No man can serve two masters.

To all readers, this study is presented with the hope that it will foster a desire to maintain the purity of scriptural worship, in service to the living God. May the Church be liberated from the corrupting influences which destroy the spiritual vitality of her worship; and may a zealous concern for our worship flow from a desire to glorify almighty God Jehovah and the only begotten God, his son, Jesus Christ.

The Surprising Origin of CHRISTMAS!

Should a Christian Celebrate Christmas

WorldNetDaily Wal-Mart worker 'history' after 'origin' of Christmas

The True Origin of CHRISTMAS

Back to Table of Contents


Now you can easily search the Lords' Witnesses website! 

Ask Gnosticus?

A Personal Letter to all of my Friends and Family

 

For those who wish to help us spread the "Good News"

 

Contact Information 

If you have any questions or comments you would like answered or expressed, please feel free to contact us at any time!

Electronic mail:  
           General Information US:   US Helpdesk (helpdesk@lordswitnesses.us)
           Tel:  1 - 701 212 4482 (US)
           Tel:  1 - 701 412 1254 (US)
           Tel:  1 - 412 977 8954 (US)
 
 
          General Information UK:   UK Helpdesk
Tel: 0207 985 8000 (UK) Please ask for Gordon or Ruth
 
General Information AT:    AT Helpdesk
          Tel: +49 176 674 22 593 (Germany)
   
          General Information Hebrew:  HE Helpdesk
          
Webmaster: Wm Morris